Thinking Like a Lawyer : A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning /
Schauer, Frederick
Thinking Like a Lawyer : A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning / Frederick Schauer. - 1 online resource (256 p.)
Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- Preface -- 1 Introduction: Is There Legal Reasoning? -- 2 Rules—in Law and Elsewhere -- 3 The Practice and Problems of Precedent -- 4 Authority and Authorities -- 5 The Use and Abuse of Analogies -- 6 The Idea of the Common Law -- 7 The Challenge of Legal Realism -- 8 The Interpretation of Statutes -- 9 The Judicial Opinion -- 10 Making Law with Rules and Standards -- 11 Law and Fact -- 12 The Burden of Proof and Its Cousins -- Index
restricted access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
This primer on legal reasoning is aimed at law students and upper-level undergraduates. But it is also an original exposition of basic legal concepts that scholars and lawyers will find stimulating. It covers such topics as rules, precedent, authority, analogical reasoning, the common law, statutory interpretation, legal realism, judicial opinions, legal facts, and burden of proof.In addressing the question whether legal reasoning is distinctive, Frederick Schauer emphasizes the formality and rule-dependence of law. When taking the words of a statute seriously, when following a rule even when it does not produce the best result, when treating the fact of a past decision as a reason for making the same decision again, or when relying on authoritative sources, the law embodies values other than simply that of making the best decision for the particular occasion or dispute. In thus pursuing goals of stability, predictability, and constraint on the idiosyncrasies of individual decision-makers, the law employs forms of reasoning that may not be unique to it but are far more dominant in legal decision-making than elsewhere.Schauer’s analysis of what makes legal reasoning special will be a valuable guide for students while also presenting a challenge to a wide range of current academic theories.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
In English.
9780674054561
10.4159/9780674054561 doi
Law--Methodology.
LAW / Legal Writing.
analogy. appellate. argumentation. binding. deference. discretion. distinguished. doctrine. equity. generality. jeremy bentham. judges. jurisdiction. justification. persuasive. regulation. standards. supreme court.
340.1
Thinking Like a Lawyer : A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning / Frederick Schauer. - 1 online resource (256 p.)
Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- Preface -- 1 Introduction: Is There Legal Reasoning? -- 2 Rules—in Law and Elsewhere -- 3 The Practice and Problems of Precedent -- 4 Authority and Authorities -- 5 The Use and Abuse of Analogies -- 6 The Idea of the Common Law -- 7 The Challenge of Legal Realism -- 8 The Interpretation of Statutes -- 9 The Judicial Opinion -- 10 Making Law with Rules and Standards -- 11 Law and Fact -- 12 The Burden of Proof and Its Cousins -- Index
restricted access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
This primer on legal reasoning is aimed at law students and upper-level undergraduates. But it is also an original exposition of basic legal concepts that scholars and lawyers will find stimulating. It covers such topics as rules, precedent, authority, analogical reasoning, the common law, statutory interpretation, legal realism, judicial opinions, legal facts, and burden of proof.In addressing the question whether legal reasoning is distinctive, Frederick Schauer emphasizes the formality and rule-dependence of law. When taking the words of a statute seriously, when following a rule even when it does not produce the best result, when treating the fact of a past decision as a reason for making the same decision again, or when relying on authoritative sources, the law embodies values other than simply that of making the best decision for the particular occasion or dispute. In thus pursuing goals of stability, predictability, and constraint on the idiosyncrasies of individual decision-makers, the law employs forms of reasoning that may not be unique to it but are far more dominant in legal decision-making than elsewhere.Schauer’s analysis of what makes legal reasoning special will be a valuable guide for students while also presenting a challenge to a wide range of current academic theories.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
In English.
9780674054561
10.4159/9780674054561 doi
Law--Methodology.
LAW / Legal Writing.
analogy. appellate. argumentation. binding. deference. discretion. distinguished. doctrine. equity. generality. jeremy bentham. judges. jurisdiction. justification. persuasive. regulation. standards. supreme court.
340.1