In-Your-Face Politics : The Consequences of Uncivil Media /
Mutz, Diana C.
In-Your-Face Politics : The Consequences of Uncivil Media / Diana C. Mutz. - Course Book - 1 online resource (288 p.) : 46 line illus. 2 tables.
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Illustrations -- Tables -- Acknowledgments -- Chapter 1. What Is "In-Your- Face" Politics? -- Part I. What Difference Does It Make? The Effects of In-Your- Face Political Television -- Chapter 2. The Consequences of In-Your- Face Politics for Arousal and Memory -- Chapter 3. Effects on Public Perceptions of the Legitimacy of the Opposition -- Chapter 4. The Costs of In-Your- Face Politics for Political Trust -- Part II. When Does In-Your- Face Politics Matter? -- Chapter 5. Real-World Contexts -- Chapter 6. Who Watches This Stuff Anyway? The Audience for In-Your- Face Politics -- Part III. Historical Implications for Political Television -- Chapter 7. Does the Medium Matter? -- Chapter 8. How Politics on Television Has Changed -- Chapter 9. Making Politics Palatable: Political Television in an Era of Choice -- Appendix A. Summary of Experimental Designs -- Appendix B. Summary of Experimental Dependent Variables -- Appendix C. National Survey Questions for Orientation toward Conflict Communication Scales -- Appendix D. Coding Form for Political Television Programs -- Appendix E. Coding Instructions for Televised Conflicts -- Notes -- References -- Index
restricted access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
Americans are disgusted with watching politicians screaming and yelling at one another on television. But does all the noise really make a difference? Drawing on numerous studies, Diana Mutz provides the first comprehensive look at the consequences of in-your-face politics. Her book contradicts the conventional wisdom by documenting both the benefits and the drawbacks of in-your-face media."In-your-face" politics refers to both the level of incivility and the up-close and personal way that we experience political conflict on television. Just as actual physical closeness intensifies people's emotional reactions to others, the appearance of closeness on a video screen has similar effects. We tend to keep our distance from those with whom we disagree. Modern media, however, puts those we dislike in our faces in a way that intensifies our negative reactions. Mutz finds that incivility is particularly detrimental to facilitating respect for oppositional political viewpoints and to citizens' levels of trust in politicians and the political process. On the positive side, incivility and close-up camera perspectives contribute to making politics more physiologically arousing and entertaining to viewers. This encourages more attention to political programs, stimulates recall of the content, and encourages people to relay content to others.In the end, In-Your-Face Politics demonstrates why political incivility is not easily dismissed as a disservice to democracy-it may even be a necessity in an age with so much competition for citizens' attention.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
In English.
9780691165110 9781400865871
10.1515/9781400865871 doi
Mass media and public opinion--United States.
Television and politics--United States.
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / General.
Internet. audiences. audiovisual medium. autonomic nervous system. broadcasts. camera perspective. civil behavior. closeness. democracy. democratic process. emotional arousal. excitation. experimental treatments. government. in-your-face politics. incivility. interpersonal distance. mainstream media. media effects. news consumption. news programs. newspapers. opposition. polarization. polite conversation. political advocates. political communication. political conflict. political cynicism. political discourse. political incivility. political programs. political television. political trust. political views. politicians. politics. public controversy. public perceptions. radio. real world. shout shows. television. viewership data. violent media. visual content.
P95.82.U6
324.730973
In-Your-Face Politics : The Consequences of Uncivil Media / Diana C. Mutz. - Course Book - 1 online resource (288 p.) : 46 line illus. 2 tables.
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Illustrations -- Tables -- Acknowledgments -- Chapter 1. What Is "In-Your- Face" Politics? -- Part I. What Difference Does It Make? The Effects of In-Your- Face Political Television -- Chapter 2. The Consequences of In-Your- Face Politics for Arousal and Memory -- Chapter 3. Effects on Public Perceptions of the Legitimacy of the Opposition -- Chapter 4. The Costs of In-Your- Face Politics for Political Trust -- Part II. When Does In-Your- Face Politics Matter? -- Chapter 5. Real-World Contexts -- Chapter 6. Who Watches This Stuff Anyway? The Audience for In-Your- Face Politics -- Part III. Historical Implications for Political Television -- Chapter 7. Does the Medium Matter? -- Chapter 8. How Politics on Television Has Changed -- Chapter 9. Making Politics Palatable: Political Television in an Era of Choice -- Appendix A. Summary of Experimental Designs -- Appendix B. Summary of Experimental Dependent Variables -- Appendix C. National Survey Questions for Orientation toward Conflict Communication Scales -- Appendix D. Coding Form for Political Television Programs -- Appendix E. Coding Instructions for Televised Conflicts -- Notes -- References -- Index
restricted access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
Americans are disgusted with watching politicians screaming and yelling at one another on television. But does all the noise really make a difference? Drawing on numerous studies, Diana Mutz provides the first comprehensive look at the consequences of in-your-face politics. Her book contradicts the conventional wisdom by documenting both the benefits and the drawbacks of in-your-face media."In-your-face" politics refers to both the level of incivility and the up-close and personal way that we experience political conflict on television. Just as actual physical closeness intensifies people's emotional reactions to others, the appearance of closeness on a video screen has similar effects. We tend to keep our distance from those with whom we disagree. Modern media, however, puts those we dislike in our faces in a way that intensifies our negative reactions. Mutz finds that incivility is particularly detrimental to facilitating respect for oppositional political viewpoints and to citizens' levels of trust in politicians and the political process. On the positive side, incivility and close-up camera perspectives contribute to making politics more physiologically arousing and entertaining to viewers. This encourages more attention to political programs, stimulates recall of the content, and encourages people to relay content to others.In the end, In-Your-Face Politics demonstrates why political incivility is not easily dismissed as a disservice to democracy-it may even be a necessity in an age with so much competition for citizens' attention.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
In English.
9780691165110 9781400865871
10.1515/9781400865871 doi
Mass media and public opinion--United States.
Television and politics--United States.
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / General.
Internet. audiences. audiovisual medium. autonomic nervous system. broadcasts. camera perspective. civil behavior. closeness. democracy. democratic process. emotional arousal. excitation. experimental treatments. government. in-your-face politics. incivility. interpersonal distance. mainstream media. media effects. news consumption. news programs. newspapers. opposition. polarization. polite conversation. political advocates. political communication. political conflict. political cynicism. political discourse. political incivility. political programs. political television. political trust. political views. politicians. politics. public controversy. public perceptions. radio. real world. shout shows. television. viewership data. violent media. visual content.
P95.82.U6
324.730973