Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Allies of Convenience : A Theory of Bargaining in U.S. Foreign Policy / Evan N. Resnick.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: New York, NY : Columbia University Press, [2019]Copyright date: ©2019Description: 1 online resource : 5 illustrationsContent type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9780231190589
  • 9780231549028
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 327.73 23
LOC classification:
  • E840 .R42 2019
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also in print.
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction. Alliances Of Convenience In International Politics And U.S. Foreign Policy -- 1. Contending Theories Of U.S. Bargaining With Allies Of Convenience -- 2. The U.S. Alliance With The People'S Republic Of China, 1971- 1989 -- 3. The U.S. Alliance With Pakistan, 1981- 1988 -- 4. The U.S. Alliance With Iraq, 1982- 1988 -- 5. The U.S. "Special Relationship" Alliance With The United Kingdom, 1950- 1953 -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Index
Summary: Since its founding, the United States has allied with unsavory dictatorships to thwart even more urgent security threats. How well has the United States managed such alliances, and what have been their consequences for its national security? In this book, Evan Resnick examines the negotiating tables between the United States and its allies of convenience since World War II and sets forth a novel theory of alliance bargaining.Resnick's neoclassical realist theory explains why U.S. leaders negotiate less effectively with unfriendly autocratic states than with friendly liberal ones. Since policy makers struggle to mobilize domestic support for controversial alliances, they seek to cast those allies in the most benign possible light. Yet this strategy has the perverse result of weakening leverage in intra-alliance disputes. Resnick tests his theory on America's Cold War era alliances with China, Pakistan, and Iraq. In all three cases, otherwise hardline presidents bargained anemically on such pivotal issues as China's sales of ballistic missiles, Pakistan's development of nuclear weapons, and Iraq's sponsorship of international terrorism. In contrast, U.S. leaders are more inclined to bargain aggressively with democratic allies who do not provoke domestic opposition, as occurred with the United Kingdom during the Korean War. An innovative work on a crucial and timely international relations topic, Allies of Convenience explains why the United States has mismanaged these "deals with the devil"-with deadly consequences.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9780231549028

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction. Alliances Of Convenience In International Politics And U.S. Foreign Policy -- 1. Contending Theories Of U.S. Bargaining With Allies Of Convenience -- 2. The U.S. Alliance With The People'S Republic Of China, 1971- 1989 -- 3. The U.S. Alliance With Pakistan, 1981- 1988 -- 4. The U.S. Alliance With Iraq, 1982- 1988 -- 5. The U.S. "Special Relationship" Alliance With The United Kingdom, 1950- 1953 -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Since its founding, the United States has allied with unsavory dictatorships to thwart even more urgent security threats. How well has the United States managed such alliances, and what have been their consequences for its national security? In this book, Evan Resnick examines the negotiating tables between the United States and its allies of convenience since World War II and sets forth a novel theory of alliance bargaining.Resnick's neoclassical realist theory explains why U.S. leaders negotiate less effectively with unfriendly autocratic states than with friendly liberal ones. Since policy makers struggle to mobilize domestic support for controversial alliances, they seek to cast those allies in the most benign possible light. Yet this strategy has the perverse result of weakening leverage in intra-alliance disputes. Resnick tests his theory on America's Cold War era alliances with China, Pakistan, and Iraq. In all three cases, otherwise hardline presidents bargained anemically on such pivotal issues as China's sales of ballistic missiles, Pakistan's development of nuclear weapons, and Iraq's sponsorship of international terrorism. In contrast, U.S. leaders are more inclined to bargain aggressively with democratic allies who do not provoke domestic opposition, as occurred with the United Kingdom during the Korean War. An innovative work on a crucial and timely international relations topic, Allies of Convenience explains why the United States has mismanaged these "deals with the devil"-with deadly consequences.

Issued also in print.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)