Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Rhetoric and Democratic Deliberation. After Gun Violence : Deliberation and Memory in an Age of Political Gridlock / Craig Rood.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Rhetoric and Democratic Deliberation ; 21Publisher: University Park, PA : Penn State University Press, [2019]Copyright date: ©2019Description: 1 online resource (200 p.)Content type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9780271085470
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 364.150973 23
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: Deliberating Gun Violence -- 1 Deliberation and Memory -- 2 The Weight of the Past: Memory and the Second Amendment -- 3 The Fleeting Past: Memory and Our Obligations to the Dead -- 4 The Implicit Past: Memory and Racism -- 5 Conclusions for Moving Beyond Gridlock -- Epilogue -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index
Summary: Mass shootings have become the “new normal” in American life. The same can be said for the public debate that follows a shooting: blame is cast, political postures are assumed, but no meaningful policy changes are enacted. In After Gun Violence, Craig Rood argues that this cycle is the result of a communication problem. Without advocating for specific policies, Rood examines how Americans talk about gun violence and suggests how we might discuss the issues more productively and move beyond our current, tragic impasse.Exploring the ways advocacy groups, community leaders, politicians, and everyday citizens talk about gun violence, Rood reveals how the gun debate is about far more than just guns. He details the role of public memory in shaping the discourse, showing how memories of the victims of gun violence, the Second Amendment, and race relations influence how gun policy is discussed. In doing so, Rood argues that forgetting and misremembering this history leads interest groups and public officials to entrenched positions and political failure and drives the public further apart.Timely and innovative, After Gun Violence advances our understanding of public discourse in an age of gridlock by illustrating how public deliberation and public memory shape and misshape one another. It is a search to understand why public discourse fails and how we can do better.

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: Deliberating Gun Violence -- 1 Deliberation and Memory -- 2 The Weight of the Past: Memory and the Second Amendment -- 3 The Fleeting Past: Memory and Our Obligations to the Dead -- 4 The Implicit Past: Memory and Racism -- 5 Conclusions for Moving Beyond Gridlock -- Epilogue -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Mass shootings have become the “new normal” in American life. The same can be said for the public debate that follows a shooting: blame is cast, political postures are assumed, but no meaningful policy changes are enacted. In After Gun Violence, Craig Rood argues that this cycle is the result of a communication problem. Without advocating for specific policies, Rood examines how Americans talk about gun violence and suggests how we might discuss the issues more productively and move beyond our current, tragic impasse.Exploring the ways advocacy groups, community leaders, politicians, and everyday citizens talk about gun violence, Rood reveals how the gun debate is about far more than just guns. He details the role of public memory in shaping the discourse, showing how memories of the victims of gun violence, the Second Amendment, and race relations influence how gun policy is discussed. In doing so, Rood argues that forgetting and misremembering this history leads interest groups and public officials to entrenched positions and political failure and drives the public further apart.Timely and innovative, After Gun Violence advances our understanding of public discourse in an age of gridlock by illustrating how public deliberation and public memory shape and misshape one another. It is a search to understand why public discourse fails and how we can do better.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 28. Mrz 2023)