Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

After Roe : The Lost History of the Abortion Debate / Mary Ziegler.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, [2015]Copyright date: ©2015Edition: Pilot project,eBook available to selected US libraries onlyDescription: 1 online resource (350 p.)Content type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9780674286269
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 362.1988/80973 23
LOC classification:
  • HQ767.5.U5 Z54 2015eb
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Abbreviations -- Timeline for Abortion History, 1965–1983 -- Introduction -- Part 1. The Pro-Life Movement after Roe -- Part II. The Abortion-Rights Movement after Roe -- Part III. The Movement-Countermovement Dynamic after Roe -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Acknowledgments -- Index
Summary: In the decade after the 1973 Supreme Court decision on abortion, advocates on both sides sought common ground. But as pro-abortion and anti-abortion positions hardened over time into pro-choice and pro-life, the myth was born that Roe v. Wade was a ruling on a woman’s right to choose. Mary Ziegler’s account offers a corrective.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9780674286269

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Abbreviations -- Timeline for Abortion History, 1965–1983 -- Introduction -- Part 1. The Pro-Life Movement after Roe -- Part II. The Abortion-Rights Movement after Roe -- Part III. The Movement-Countermovement Dynamic after Roe -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Acknowledgments -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

In the decade after the 1973 Supreme Court decision on abortion, advocates on both sides sought common ground. But as pro-abortion and anti-abortion positions hardened over time into pro-choice and pro-life, the myth was born that Roe v. Wade was a ruling on a woman’s right to choose. Mary Ziegler’s account offers a corrective.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022)