The One ‹i›King Lear‹/i› / Brian Vickers.
Material type:
TextPublisher: Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, [2016]Copyright date: ©2016Description: 1 online resource (416 p.) : 7 halftones, 1 line illustration, 2 tablesContent type: - 9780674970311
- 822.3/3 23
- PR2819 .V53 2016
- online - DeGruyter
| Item type | Current library | Call number | URL | Status | Notes | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eBook
|
Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online | online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Online access | Not for loan (Accesso limitato) | Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users | (dgr)9780674970311 |
Browsing Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino shelves, Shelving location: Nuvola online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| online - DeGruyter From Steel to Slots : Casino Capitalism in the Postindustrial City / | online - DeGruyter The Language Animal : The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity / | online - DeGruyter The Mormon Jesus : A Biography / | online - DeGruyter The One ‹i›King Lear‹/i› / | online - DeGruyter Political Political Theory : Essays on Institutions / | online - DeGruyter The French Resistance / | online - DeGruyter Battle for Bed-Stuy : The Long War on Poverty in New York City / |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- A Note on References -- Part 1. The Quarto, 1608 -- Chapter 1. King Lear at the Printer -- Chapter 2. Adjusting Text Space to Print Space in the Shakespeare Folio and Quartos -- Chapter 3. Nicholas Okes Compresses the Play -- Chapter 4. Nicholas Okes Abridges It -- Part 2. The Folio, 1623 -- Chapter 5. One Play, One Manuscript, Two Printed Books -- Chapter 6. The Folio Editors Regularize Shakespeare -- Chapter 7. The King’s Men Abridge a Tragedy -- Part 3. The One King Lear -- Chapter 8. The “Two Versions” Revisited -- Conclusion: Toward a New Consensus -- Appendix 1. Illustrations and Commentary -- Appendix 2. Space Saving in Q1 King Lear -- Notes -- Index
restricted access online access with authorization star
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
In the 1980s influential scholars argued that Shakespeare revised King Lear in light of theatrical performance, resulting in two texts by the bard’s own hand. The two-text theory hardened into orthodoxy. Here Sir Brian Vickers makes the case that Shakespeare did not cut his original text. At stake is the way his greatest play is read and performed.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
In English.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022)

