Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Epic and Empire : Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton / David Quint.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Literature in History ; 1Publisher: Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, [2021]Copyright date: ©1993Description: 1 online resource (444 p.) : 1 figContent type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9780691222950
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 809.1/32 20
LOC classification:
  • PN1303
  • PN1303
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- INTRODUCTION -- PART ONE. EPIC AND THE WINNERS -- ONE. EPIC AND EMPIRE: VERSIONS OF ACTIUM -- TWO. REPETITION AND IDEOLOGY IN THE AENEID -- PART TWO. EPIC AND THE LOSERS -- THREE. THE EPIC CURSE AND CAMOES' ADAMASTOR -- FOUR. EPICS OF THE DEFEATED: THE OTHER TRADITION OF LUCAN, ERCILLA, AND D'AUBIGNE -- PART THREE. TASSO AND MILTON -- FIVE. POLITICAL ALLEGORY IN THE GERUSALEMME LIBERATA -- SIX. TASSO, MILTON, AND THE BOAT OF ROMANCE -- SEVEN. PARADISE LOST AND THE FALL OF THE ENGLISH COMMONWEALTH -- EIGHT. DAVID'S CENSUS: MILTON'S POLITICS AND PARADISE REGAINED -- PART FOUR. A MODERN EPILOGUE -- NINE. OSSIAN, MEDIEVAL "EPIC," AND EISENSTEIN'S ALEXANDER NEVSKY -- NOTES -- INDEX
Summary: Alexander the Great, according to Plutarch, carried on his campaigns a copy of the Iliad, kept alongside a dagger; on a more pronounced ideological level, ancient Romans looked to the Aeneid as an argument for imperialism. In this major reinterpretation of epic poetry beginning with Virgil, David Quint explores the political context and meanings of key works in Western literature. He divides the history of the genre into two political traditions: the Virgilian epics of conquest and empire that take the victors' side (the Aeneid itself, Camoes's Lusíadas, Tasso's Gerusalemme liberata) and the countervailing epic of the defeated and of republican liberty (Lucan's Pharsalia, Ercilla's Araucana, and d'Aubigné's Les tragiques). These traditions produce opposing ideas of historical narrative: a linear, teleological narrative that belongs to the imperial conquerors, and an episodic and open-ended narrative identified with "romance," the story told of and by the defeated. Quint situates Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained within these rival traditions. He extends his political analysis to the scholarly revival of medieval epic in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and to Sergei Eisenstein's epic film, Alexander Nevsky. Attending both to the topical contexts of individual poems and to the larger historical development of the epic genre, Epic and Empire provides new models for exploring the relationship between ideology and literary form.

Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- INTRODUCTION -- PART ONE. EPIC AND THE WINNERS -- ONE. EPIC AND EMPIRE: VERSIONS OF ACTIUM -- TWO. REPETITION AND IDEOLOGY IN THE AENEID -- PART TWO. EPIC AND THE LOSERS -- THREE. THE EPIC CURSE AND CAMOES' ADAMASTOR -- FOUR. EPICS OF THE DEFEATED: THE OTHER TRADITION OF LUCAN, ERCILLA, AND D'AUBIGNE -- PART THREE. TASSO AND MILTON -- FIVE. POLITICAL ALLEGORY IN THE GERUSALEMME LIBERATA -- SIX. TASSO, MILTON, AND THE BOAT OF ROMANCE -- SEVEN. PARADISE LOST AND THE FALL OF THE ENGLISH COMMONWEALTH -- EIGHT. DAVID'S CENSUS: MILTON'S POLITICS AND PARADISE REGAINED -- PART FOUR. A MODERN EPILOGUE -- NINE. OSSIAN, MEDIEVAL "EPIC," AND EISENSTEIN'S ALEXANDER NEVSKY -- NOTES -- INDEX

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Alexander the Great, according to Plutarch, carried on his campaigns a copy of the Iliad, kept alongside a dagger; on a more pronounced ideological level, ancient Romans looked to the Aeneid as an argument for imperialism. In this major reinterpretation of epic poetry beginning with Virgil, David Quint explores the political context and meanings of key works in Western literature. He divides the history of the genre into two political traditions: the Virgilian epics of conquest and empire that take the victors' side (the Aeneid itself, Camoes's Lusíadas, Tasso's Gerusalemme liberata) and the countervailing epic of the defeated and of republican liberty (Lucan's Pharsalia, Ercilla's Araucana, and d'Aubigné's Les tragiques). These traditions produce opposing ideas of historical narrative: a linear, teleological narrative that belongs to the imperial conquerors, and an episodic and open-ended narrative identified with "romance," the story told of and by the defeated. Quint situates Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained within these rival traditions. He extends his political analysis to the scholarly revival of medieval epic in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and to Sergei Eisenstein's epic film, Alexander Nevsky. Attending both to the topical contexts of individual poems and to the larger historical development of the epic genre, Epic and Empire provides new models for exploring the relationship between ideology and literary form.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 07. Nov 2022)