Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Bold Relief : Institutional Politics and the Origins of Modern American Social Policy / Edwin Amenta.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Princeton Studies in American Politics: Historical, International, and Comparative Perspectives ; 62Publisher: Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, [2022]Copyright date: ©1998Description: 1 online resource (320 p.) : 19 halftones, 7 charts, 19 tablesContent type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9780691227481
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HN57
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- ILLUSTRATIONS -- TABLES AND FIGURES -- PREFACE -- INTRODUCTION Paradoxes of American Social Policy -- CHAPTER ONE An Institutional Politics Theory of Social Policy -- CHAPTER TWO An Indifferent Commitment to Modern Social Policy, 1880-1934 -- CHAPTER THREE America's First Welfare Reform, 1935-1936 -- CHAPTER FOUR Consolidating the Work and Relief Policy, 1937-1939 -- CHAPTER FIVE Some Little New Deals Are Littler than Others -- CHAPTER SIX Redefining the New Deal, 1940-1950 -- CHAPTER SEVEN A Welfare State for Britain -- CONCLUSION -- AFTERWORD -- NOTES -- INITIALS OF ORGANIZATIONS AND PROGRAMS -- INDEX
Summary: According to conventional wisdom, American social policy has always been exceptional--exceptionally stingy and backwards. But Edwin Amenta reminds us here that sixty years ago the United States led the world in spending on social provision. He combines history and political theory to account for this surprising fact--and to explain why the country's leading role was short-lived. The orthodox view is that American social policy began in the 1930s as a two-track system of miserly "welfare" for the unemployed and generous "social security" for the elderly. However, Amenta shows that the New Deal was in fact a bold program of relief, committed to providing jobs and income support for the unemployed. Social security was, by comparison, a policy afterthought. By the late 1930s, he shows, the U.S. pledged more of its gross national product to relief programs than did any other major industrial country. Amenta develops and uses an institutional politics theory to explain how social policy expansion was driven by northern Democrats, state-based reformers, and political outsiders. And he shows that retrenchment in the 1940s was led by politicians from areas where beneficiaries of relief were barred from voting. He also considers why some programs were nationalized, why some states had far-reaching "little New Deals," and why Britain--otherwise so similar to the United States--adopted more generous social programs. Bold Relief will transform our understanding of the roots of American social policy and of the institutional and political dynamics that will shape its future.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9780691227481

Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- ILLUSTRATIONS -- TABLES AND FIGURES -- PREFACE -- INTRODUCTION Paradoxes of American Social Policy -- CHAPTER ONE An Institutional Politics Theory of Social Policy -- CHAPTER TWO An Indifferent Commitment to Modern Social Policy, 1880-1934 -- CHAPTER THREE America's First Welfare Reform, 1935-1936 -- CHAPTER FOUR Consolidating the Work and Relief Policy, 1937-1939 -- CHAPTER FIVE Some Little New Deals Are Littler than Others -- CHAPTER SIX Redefining the New Deal, 1940-1950 -- CHAPTER SEVEN A Welfare State for Britain -- CONCLUSION -- AFTERWORD -- NOTES -- INITIALS OF ORGANIZATIONS AND PROGRAMS -- INDEX

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

According to conventional wisdom, American social policy has always been exceptional--exceptionally stingy and backwards. But Edwin Amenta reminds us here that sixty years ago the United States led the world in spending on social provision. He combines history and political theory to account for this surprising fact--and to explain why the country's leading role was short-lived. The orthodox view is that American social policy began in the 1930s as a two-track system of miserly "welfare" for the unemployed and generous "social security" for the elderly. However, Amenta shows that the New Deal was in fact a bold program of relief, committed to providing jobs and income support for the unemployed. Social security was, by comparison, a policy afterthought. By the late 1930s, he shows, the U.S. pledged more of its gross national product to relief programs than did any other major industrial country. Amenta develops and uses an institutional politics theory to explain how social policy expansion was driven by northern Democrats, state-based reformers, and political outsiders. And he shows that retrenchment in the 1940s was led by politicians from areas where beneficiaries of relief were barred from voting. He also considers why some programs were nationalized, why some states had far-reaching "little New Deals," and why Britain--otherwise so similar to the United States--adopted more generous social programs. Bold Relief will transform our understanding of the roots of American social policy and of the institutional and political dynamics that will shape its future.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jul 2022)