Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

The Judicial Imagination : Writing After Nuremberg / Lyndsey Stonebridge.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, [2022]Copyright date: ©2011Description: 1 online resource (192 p.) : 2 B/W illustrationsContent type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9780748642359
  • 9780748647057
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 820.9355409045 22
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Illustrations -- Introduction. Gathering Ashes: The Judicial Imagination in the Age of Trauma -- Part I: Writing After Nuremberg -- 1. ‘An event that did not become an experience’: Rebecca West’s Nuremberg -- 2. The Man in the Glass Booth: Hannah Arendt’s Irony -- 3. Fiction in Jerusalem: Muriel Spark’s Idiom of Judgement -- Part II: Territorial Rights -- 4. ‘We Refugees’: Hannah Arendt and the Perplexities of Human Rights -- 5. ‘Creatures of an Impossible Time’: Late Modernism, Human Rights and Elizabeth Bowen -- 6. The ‘Dark Background of Difference’: Love and the Refugee in Iris Murdoch -- Bibliography -- Index
Summary: Tells the story of the struggle to imagine new forms of justice after Nuremberg.Returning to the work of Hannah Arendt as a theoretical starting point, Lyndsey Stonebridge traces an aesthetics of judgement in postwar writers and intellectuals, including including Rebecca West, Elizabeth Bowen, Muriel Spark and Iris Murdoch. Writing in the false dawn of a new era of international justice and human rights, these complicated women intellectuals were drawn to the law because of its promise of justice, yet critical of its political blindness and suspicious of its moral claims. Bringing together literary-legal theory with trauma studies, The Judicial Imagination, argues that today we have much to learn from these writers' impassioned scepticism about the law's ability to legislate for the territorial violence of our times.Key Features Returns to the work of Hannah Arendt as the starting point for a new theorisation of the relation between law and traumaProvides a new context for understanding the continuities between late modernism and postwar writing through a focus on justice and human rightsOffers a model of reading between history, law and literature which focuses on how matters of style and genre articulate moral, philosophical and political ambiguities and perplexitiesMakes a significant contribution to the rapidly developing fields of literary-legal and human rights studies
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9780748647057

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Illustrations -- Introduction. Gathering Ashes: The Judicial Imagination in the Age of Trauma -- Part I: Writing After Nuremberg -- 1. ‘An event that did not become an experience’: Rebecca West’s Nuremberg -- 2. The Man in the Glass Booth: Hannah Arendt’s Irony -- 3. Fiction in Jerusalem: Muriel Spark’s Idiom of Judgement -- Part II: Territorial Rights -- 4. ‘We Refugees’: Hannah Arendt and the Perplexities of Human Rights -- 5. ‘Creatures of an Impossible Time’: Late Modernism, Human Rights and Elizabeth Bowen -- 6. The ‘Dark Background of Difference’: Love and the Refugee in Iris Murdoch -- Bibliography -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Tells the story of the struggle to imagine new forms of justice after Nuremberg.Returning to the work of Hannah Arendt as a theoretical starting point, Lyndsey Stonebridge traces an aesthetics of judgement in postwar writers and intellectuals, including including Rebecca West, Elizabeth Bowen, Muriel Spark and Iris Murdoch. Writing in the false dawn of a new era of international justice and human rights, these complicated women intellectuals were drawn to the law because of its promise of justice, yet critical of its political blindness and suspicious of its moral claims. Bringing together literary-legal theory with trauma studies, The Judicial Imagination, argues that today we have much to learn from these writers' impassioned scepticism about the law's ability to legislate for the territorial violence of our times.Key Features Returns to the work of Hannah Arendt as the starting point for a new theorisation of the relation between law and traumaProvides a new context for understanding the continuities between late modernism and postwar writing through a focus on justice and human rightsOffers a model of reading between history, law and literature which focuses on how matters of style and genre articulate moral, philosophical and political ambiguities and perplexitiesMakes a significant contribution to the rapidly developing fields of literary-legal and human rights studies

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jun 2022)