Zion's Dilemmas : How Israel Makes National Security Policy / Charles D. Freilich.
Material type:
TextSeries: Cornell Studies in Security AffairsPublisher: Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, [2012]Copyright date: ©2014Description: 1 online resource (336 p.) : 9 tablesContent type: - 9780801465741
- National security -- Israel -- Decision making
- Middle East Studies
- Political Science & Political History
- Security Studies
- POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International)
- middle eastern policy, israel international relations, israeli politics, israeli ministry of defense, international media, middle eastern history
- 355.03355694 23
- UA853.I8 F73 2016
- online - DeGruyter
| Item type | Current library | Call number | URL | Status | Notes | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eBook
|
Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online | online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Online access | Not for loan (Accesso limitato) | Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users | (dgr)9780801465741 |
Browsing Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino shelves, Shelving location: Nuvola online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| online - DeGruyter Only Muslim : Embodying Islam in Twentieth-Century France / | online - DeGruyter Capital, Coercion, and Postcommunist States / | online - DeGruyter Queen of Vaudeville : The Story of Eva Tanguay / | online - DeGruyter Zion's Dilemmas : How Israel Makes National Security Policy / | online - DeGruyter Atomic Assistance : How "Atoms for Peace" Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity / | online - DeGruyter Nuclear Statecraft : History and Strategy in America's Atomic Age / | online - DeGruyter Conflicting Commitments : The Politics of Enforcing Immigrant Worker Rights in San Jose and Houston / |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface and Acknowledgments -- Acronyms -- Dramatis Personae -- Introduction -- Part I. The Setting -- 1. Constraints and Players: The External Environment, Proportional Representation System, and National Security Establishment -- 2. The Decision-Making Process: How the System Actually Works -- Part II. The Case Studies -- 3. Camp David I: Making Peace with Egypt, 1977–1979 -- 4. The Makings of a Young Lion: The Lavi Combat Aircraft, 1980–1987 -- 5. The Invasion of Lebanon, 1982 -- 6. Leaving Lebanon: The Unilateral Withdrawal, 2000 -- 7. Camp David II: The Israeli- Palestinian Negotiations, 1999–2000 -- 8. Disengaging from Gaza, 2005 -- 9. Back Again: The Second Lebanon War, 2006 -- III. FINAL THOUGHTS -- Conclusions and Recommendations -- Appendix 1. The INSC Law, 2008 -- Appendix 2. Recommendations of the Winograd Commission and the Shahak Committee -- List of Interviews -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index
restricted access online access with authorization star
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
In Zion's Dilemmas, a former deputy national security adviser to the State of Israel details the history and, in many cases, the chronic inadequacies in the making of Israeli national security policy. Chuck Freilich identifies profound, ongoing problems that he ascribes to a series of factors: a hostile and highly volatile regional environment, Israel's proportional representation electoral system, and structural peculiarities of the Israeli government and bureaucracy.Freilich uses his insider understanding and substantial archival and interview research to describe how Israel has made strategic decisions and to present a first of its kind model of national security decision-making in Israel. He analyzes the major events of the last thirty years, from Camp David I to the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, through Camp David II, the Gaza Disengagement Plan of 2005, and the second Lebanon war of 2006.In these and other cases he identifies opportunities forgone, failures that resulted from a flawed decision-making process, and the entanglement of Israeli leaders in an inconsistent, highly politicized, and sometimes improvisational planning process. The cabinet is dysfunctional and Israel does not have an effective statutory forum for its decision-making—most of which is thus conducted in informal settings. In many cases policy objectives and options are poorly formulated. For all these problems, however, the Israeli decision-making process does have some strengths, among them the ability to make rapid and flexible responses, generally pragmatic decision-making, effective planning within the defense establishment, and the skills and motivation of those involved. Freilich concludes with cogent and timely recommendations for reform.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
In English.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 26. Apr 2024)

