Race and the Making of American Political Science / Jessica Blatt.
Material type:
TextSeries: American Governance: Politics, Policy, and Public LawPublisher: Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press, [2018]Copyright date: ©2018Description: 1 online resource (216 p.)Content type: - 9780812294897
- 320.0973 23
- JA84.U5 B49 2018eb
- online - DeGruyter
| Item type | Current library | Call number | URL | Status | Notes | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eBook
|
Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online | online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Online access | Not for loan (Accesso limitato) | Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users | (dgr)9780812294897 |
Browsing Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino shelves, Shelving location: Nuvola online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| online - DeGruyter Dynamics of Difference in Australia : Indigenous Past and Present in a Settler Country / | online - DeGruyter Mastery of Nature : Promises and Prospects / | online - DeGruyter How the Anglo-Saxons Read Their Poems / | online - DeGruyter Race and the Making of American Political Science / | online - DeGruyter Christian Slavery : Conversion and Race in the Protestant Atlantic World / | online - DeGruyter Argentina Betrayed : Memory, Mourning, and Accountability / | online - DeGruyter Colonial Complexions : Race and Bodies in Eighteenth-Century America / |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. “The White Man’s Mission”: John W. Burgess and the Columbia School of Political Science -- Chapter 2. “All Things Lawful Are Not Expedient”: The American Political Science Association Considers Jim Crow -- Chapter 3. Twentieth-Century Problems: Administering an American Empire -- Chapter 4. The Journal of Race Development: Evolution and Uplift -- Chapter 5. Laying Specters to Rest: Political Science Encounters the Boasian Critique of Racial Anthropology -- Chapter 6. Finding New Premises: Race Science, Philanthropy, and the Institutional Establishment of Political Science -- Epilogue -- Notes -- Index -- Acknowledgments
restricted access online access with authorization star
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
Race and the Making of American Political Science shows that changing scientific ideas about racial difference were central to the academic study of politics as it emerged in the United States. From the late nineteenth century through the 1930s, scholars of politics defined and continually reoriented their field in response to the political imperatives of the racial order at home and abroad as well to as the vagaries of race science.The Gilded Age scholars who founded the first university departments and journals located sovereignty and legitimacy in a "Teutonic germ" of liberty planted in the new world by Anglo-Saxon settlers and almost extinguished in the conflict over slavery. Within a generation, "Teutonism" would come to seem like philosophical speculation, but well into the twentieth century, major political scientists understood racial difference to be a fundamental shaper of political life. They wove popular and scientific ideas about race into their accounts of political belonging, of progress and change, of proper hierarchy, and of democracy and its warrants. And they attended closely to new developments in race science, viewing them as central to their own core questions. In doing so, they constructed models of human difference and political life that still exert a powerful hold on our political imagination today, in and outside of the academy.By tracing this history, Jessica Blatt effects a bold reinterpretation of the origins of U.S. political science, one that embeds that history in larger processes of the coproduction of racial ideas, racial oppression, and political knowledge.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
In English.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021)

