Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Democracy and Markets : The Politics of Mixed Economies / John R. Freeman.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Cornell Studies in Political EconomyPublisher: Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, [2018]Copyright date: ©1989Description: 1 online resource (352 p.) : 16 halftones, 10 tablesContent type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9781501724206
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 330 19
LOC classification:
  • HB90 .F73 1989
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Part One: Introduction -- 1. Which Political-Economic System Is Most Desirable? -- 2. Theoretical Perspectives -- Part Two: Theory -- 3. Private Enterprise and Mixed Economies Compared -- 4. Democratic Polities Compared -- 5. The Politics of Mixed Economies -- Part Three: Evidence -- 6. Welfare Outcomes: Cross-National Evidence -- 7. A Tale of Two Political Economies -- 8. The Italian and Swedish Experiences -- Part Four: Extensions And Implications -- 9. The Politics of Openness and Foreign Public Enterprise -- 10. The Tale of Two Political Economies Revisited -- 11. Democracy and Capitalism -- References -- Index
Summary: Events of the 1970s and 1980s have provoked intense controversy about the desirability of existing political and economic institutions. On the basis of an analysis of social welfare in varying types of market systems and in certain democratic political systems, Democracy and Markets illuminates alternative directions for institutional reform. Examining in detail the experiences of several democratic European countries, John R. Freeman considers whether a mixed ownership structure is preferable to a private ownership structure; and whether a pluralist type of democratic politics is preferable to a corporatist type.Freeman compares the benefits of the two economic and two political systems separately, and then analyzes the workings of four basic political economies. This analysis yields a welfare taxonomy for alternative forms of democratic capitalism and more specifically a characterization of the blends of collective gain and distributional equity that can be achieved in the four systems. Freeman demonstrates the validity of this taxonomy through an empirical investigation of the political economies of Britain, Austria, Sweden, and Italy. Under current conditions, he concludes, the corporatist-mixed system produces the most desirable blend of welfare outcomes.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9781501724206

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Part One: Introduction -- 1. Which Political-Economic System Is Most Desirable? -- 2. Theoretical Perspectives -- Part Two: Theory -- 3. Private Enterprise and Mixed Economies Compared -- 4. Democratic Polities Compared -- 5. The Politics of Mixed Economies -- Part Three: Evidence -- 6. Welfare Outcomes: Cross-National Evidence -- 7. A Tale of Two Political Economies -- 8. The Italian and Swedish Experiences -- Part Four: Extensions And Implications -- 9. The Politics of Openness and Foreign Public Enterprise -- 10. The Tale of Two Political Economies Revisited -- 11. Democracy and Capitalism -- References -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Events of the 1970s and 1980s have provoked intense controversy about the desirability of existing political and economic institutions. On the basis of an analysis of social welfare in varying types of market systems and in certain democratic political systems, Democracy and Markets illuminates alternative directions for institutional reform. Examining in detail the experiences of several democratic European countries, John R. Freeman considers whether a mixed ownership structure is preferable to a private ownership structure; and whether a pluralist type of democratic politics is preferable to a corporatist type.Freeman compares the benefits of the two economic and two political systems separately, and then analyzes the workings of four basic political economies. This analysis yields a welfare taxonomy for alternative forms of democratic capitalism and more specifically a characterization of the blends of collective gain and distributional equity that can be achieved in the four systems. Freeman demonstrates the validity of this taxonomy through an empirical investigation of the political economies of Britain, Austria, Sweden, and Italy. Under current conditions, he concludes, the corporatist-mixed system produces the most desirable blend of welfare outcomes.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 26. Apr 2024)