Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

The Sacred Cause : Civil-Military Conflict over Soviet National Security, 1917–1992 / Thomas M. Nichols.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Cornell Studies in Security AffairsPublisher: Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, [2019]Copyright date: ©1993Description: 1 online resource (304 p.)Content type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9781501737312
Subject(s): Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction: "Our National and Sacred Cause" -- 1. Bureaucrats or Bonapartes? Western Views of the Soviet Military -- 2. Setting the Stage: Stalin and the Military -- 3. Khrushchev's Revolution: Stalinism without Stalin? -- 4. The "Golden Age" and After: Brezhnev's Retreat and Military Ascendance -- 5. Reform and Resistance: Gorbachev and the Military, 1983-1986 -- 6. Abandoning Pretenses: Gorbachev and the Military, 1987-1988 -- 7. The End of an Era: The Soviet Armed Forces and the "Political Struggle" -- 8. Rethinking Soviet Civil-Military Relations: Prospects for the 1990s -- Index
Summary: To the officers of the USSR Armed Forces, the defense of the Soviet Union was, in the words of a Soviet general, a "sacred cause." What was the nature of Soviet civil-military relations, and what have the new militaries inherited from the Soviet experience? In this book Thomas M. Nichols examines the struggles over national security policy between military officers and political leaders in the USSR, and shows that the Soviet civil-military relationship has a long history of conflict rather than cooperation.Nichols disputes the longstanding Wes tern belief in Party–Army amity. He argues that Party control over the Soviet armed forces has been tenuous since Stalin's death; the relationship was inherently unstable and conflictual, growing in intensity because of Gorbachev and his approach to domestic and foreign policy reforms.The source of this instability lay in the creation of the Soviet Armed Forces as a Marxist military, and Nichols maintains that this privileged and highly ideological institution found itself in frequent conflict with a Party that had of necessity to take an increasingly pragmatic approach to international politics. Movement toward a politically isolated and professionalized military, he shows, was continuously subverted by civilian leaders who sought to control military issues through political intrusions into doctrine and strategy.He concludes that the new leaders of the post-Soviet republics have inherited a group of military organizations that continue to resist the abandonment both of their ideological foundations and of their cohesion as a multinational military-a situation he believes may prove to be one of the greatest threats to the emerging post-Soviet democracies.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9781501737312

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction: "Our National and Sacred Cause" -- 1. Bureaucrats or Bonapartes? Western Views of the Soviet Military -- 2. Setting the Stage: Stalin and the Military -- 3. Khrushchev's Revolution: Stalinism without Stalin? -- 4. The "Golden Age" and After: Brezhnev's Retreat and Military Ascendance -- 5. Reform and Resistance: Gorbachev and the Military, 1983-1986 -- 6. Abandoning Pretenses: Gorbachev and the Military, 1987-1988 -- 7. The End of an Era: The Soviet Armed Forces and the "Political Struggle" -- 8. Rethinking Soviet Civil-Military Relations: Prospects for the 1990s -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

To the officers of the USSR Armed Forces, the defense of the Soviet Union was, in the words of a Soviet general, a "sacred cause." What was the nature of Soviet civil-military relations, and what have the new militaries inherited from the Soviet experience? In this book Thomas M. Nichols examines the struggles over national security policy between military officers and political leaders in the USSR, and shows that the Soviet civil-military relationship has a long history of conflict rather than cooperation.Nichols disputes the longstanding Wes tern belief in Party–Army amity. He argues that Party control over the Soviet armed forces has been tenuous since Stalin's death; the relationship was inherently unstable and conflictual, growing in intensity because of Gorbachev and his approach to domestic and foreign policy reforms.The source of this instability lay in the creation of the Soviet Armed Forces as a Marxist military, and Nichols maintains that this privileged and highly ideological institution found itself in frequent conflict with a Party that had of necessity to take an increasingly pragmatic approach to international politics. Movement toward a politically isolated and professionalized military, he shows, was continuously subverted by civilian leaders who sought to control military issues through political intrusions into doctrine and strategy.He concludes that the new leaders of the post-Soviet republics have inherited a group of military organizations that continue to resist the abandonment both of their ideological foundations and of their cohesion as a multinational military-a situation he believes may prove to be one of the greatest threats to the emerging post-Soviet democracies.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)