Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

The Concept of Justice and Equality : On the Dispute between John Rawls and Gerald Cohen / Eliane Saadé.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Practical Philosophy ; 20Publisher: Berlin ; Boston : De Gruyter, [2015]Copyright date: ©2015Description: 1 online resource (223 p.)Content type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9783110447194
  • 9783110447408
  • 9783110448900
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 100 23
LOC classification:
  • JC578
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also in print.
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Foreword -- Contents -- Introduction -- 1 The Rawlsian Theory of Justice -- 2 A Meta-Ethical Theory: Cohen’s Idea of Justice -- 3 A Meta-Ethical Theory: Cohen’s Rescue of Justice -- 4 The Difference Principle -- 5 The Rescue of Equality from the Rawlsian Theory of Justice -- 6 Scrutinizing the Cohenian Rescue of Equality -- 7 The Cohenian Alternative -- 8 Disagreement on the Status of Principles -- 9 Disagreement on the Status of Facts -- 10 Different Understandings of Justice -- Conclusion -- References -- Author Index -- Subject Index
Summary: Unless considered on a practical level, where a precise distribution of social goods is chosen, John Rawls’s and Gerald Cohen’s approaches to social justice cannot be complementary. Their disagreement about justice and its principles calls for a choice, which opts either for the Rawlsian theory or for the Cohenian one. What is the more plausible approach to social justice? This work compares both approaches and aims to defend Cohen’s position in the light of two considerations. It answers the philosophical question about the analysis of the idea of justice, which puts the virtue of justice in its philosophical context. It, however, presents a method everyone can apply in order to arrive at the fundamental principles of justice by employing the power of reason. An analysis of the concept of justice based on the power of reason should seek to uncover the ultimate nature of justice, which is independent of facts and of other virtues. Once exposed, the understanding of justice arrived at should inform social institutions and determine people’s daily decisions. A just society is therefore a society where just persons and just institutions exhibit the virtue of justice.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9783110448900

Frontmatter -- Foreword -- Contents -- Introduction -- 1 The Rawlsian Theory of Justice -- 2 A Meta-Ethical Theory: Cohen’s Idea of Justice -- 3 A Meta-Ethical Theory: Cohen’s Rescue of Justice -- 4 The Difference Principle -- 5 The Rescue of Equality from the Rawlsian Theory of Justice -- 6 Scrutinizing the Cohenian Rescue of Equality -- 7 The Cohenian Alternative -- 8 Disagreement on the Status of Principles -- 9 Disagreement on the Status of Facts -- 10 Different Understandings of Justice -- Conclusion -- References -- Author Index -- Subject Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Unless considered on a practical level, where a precise distribution of social goods is chosen, John Rawls’s and Gerald Cohen’s approaches to social justice cannot be complementary. Their disagreement about justice and its principles calls for a choice, which opts either for the Rawlsian theory or for the Cohenian one. What is the more plausible approach to social justice? This work compares both approaches and aims to defend Cohen’s position in the light of two considerations. It answers the philosophical question about the analysis of the idea of justice, which puts the virtue of justice in its philosophical context. It, however, presents a method everyone can apply in order to arrive at the fundamental principles of justice by employing the power of reason. An analysis of the concept of justice based on the power of reason should seek to uncover the ultimate nature of justice, which is independent of facts and of other virtues. Once exposed, the understanding of justice arrived at should inform social institutions and determine people’s daily decisions. A just society is therefore a society where just persons and just institutions exhibit the virtue of justice.

Issued also in print.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 28. Feb 2023)