Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Acts of Interpretation : Ancient Religious Semiotic Ideologies and Their Modern Echoes / Naomi Janowitz.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Religion and Reason : Theory in the Study of Religion ; 66Publisher: Berlin ; Boston : De Gruyter, [2022]Copyright date: ©2022Description: 1 online resource (X, 160 p.)Content type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9783110768596
  • 9783110768626
  • 9783110768602
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 210.14 23/eng/20220608
LOC classification:
  • BL65.L2 J35 2022
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also in print.
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- Introduction: Explaining and Misunderstanding How Signs Work -- 1 Ancient Ideologies of Ineffability and Their Reverberations -- 2 Speech Acts and Divine Names: Comparing Ancient and Modern Linguistic Ideologies of Performativity -- 3 Creating the Forbidden Sign: Ancient and Modern Debates about Proper Representation -- 4 Late Antique and Modern Semiotic Models of Letter and Spirit -- 5 A Semiotic Approach to Ascent Liturgies -- 6 The Indeterminate Meaning of Burning Man Rituals and Modern Notions of Spirit -- Conclusions -- Appendix 1: Ninja and Tijuana Vows -- Appendix 2: Marry Yourself Vows -- Bibliography -- Index of Persons -- Index of subjects
Summary: Ancient authors debated proper verbal and non-verbal signs as representations of divinity. These understanding of signs were based on ideas drawn from language and thus limited due to a their partial understanding of the multi-functionality of signs. Charles S. Peirce’s semiotics, as adapted by anthropological linguists including Michael Silverstein, better explains the contextual linkages ("performativity") of ancient religious signs such as divine names. Sign meaning is always dependent on processes of interpretation and is always open to reinterpretation. Focusing on these processes permits a more detailed analysis of the ancient evidence. Examples are drawn from ancient Israelite verbal and non-verbal divine representation, the apostle Paul’s linguistic letter/spirit model, Christian debates about the limits of language to best represent the deity, Josephus’ aniconic advertisement of Jewish rites, the multi-layered divine representations in the Dura-Europos synagogue, the diverse "performativity" of Jewish ascent liturgies, and—the single modern example—the role of art at Burning Man. Divine representation is the basis for ritual efficacy even as sign meaning is a constant source of contention.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9783110768602

Frontmatter -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- Introduction: Explaining and Misunderstanding How Signs Work -- 1 Ancient Ideologies of Ineffability and Their Reverberations -- 2 Speech Acts and Divine Names: Comparing Ancient and Modern Linguistic Ideologies of Performativity -- 3 Creating the Forbidden Sign: Ancient and Modern Debates about Proper Representation -- 4 Late Antique and Modern Semiotic Models of Letter and Spirit -- 5 A Semiotic Approach to Ascent Liturgies -- 6 The Indeterminate Meaning of Burning Man Rituals and Modern Notions of Spirit -- Conclusions -- Appendix 1: Ninja and Tijuana Vows -- Appendix 2: Marry Yourself Vows -- Bibliography -- Index of Persons -- Index of subjects

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Ancient authors debated proper verbal and non-verbal signs as representations of divinity. These understanding of signs were based on ideas drawn from language and thus limited due to a their partial understanding of the multi-functionality of signs. Charles S. Peirce’s semiotics, as adapted by anthropological linguists including Michael Silverstein, better explains the contextual linkages ("performativity") of ancient religious signs such as divine names. Sign meaning is always dependent on processes of interpretation and is always open to reinterpretation. Focusing on these processes permits a more detailed analysis of the ancient evidence. Examples are drawn from ancient Israelite verbal and non-verbal divine representation, the apostle Paul’s linguistic letter/spirit model, Christian debates about the limits of language to best represent the deity, Josephus’ aniconic advertisement of Jewish rites, the multi-layered divine representations in the Dura-Europos synagogue, the diverse "performativity" of Jewish ascent liturgies, and—the single modern example—the role of art at Burning Man. Divine representation is the basis for ritual efficacy even as sign meaning is a constant source of contention.

Issued also in print.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mai 2023)

Previous
Back to results
Next
Close