TY  - BOOK
AU  - Csigó,Péter
TI  - The Neopopular Bubble: Speculating on "the People" in Late Modern Democracy 
SN  - 9789633861684
AV  - JC423 .C773 2016
U1  - 321.8 
PY  - 2017///]
CY  - Budapest, New York : 
PB  - Central European University Press, 
KW  - Capitalism
KW  - Political aspects
KW  - Democracy
KW  - Economic aspects
KW  - Democracy--Economic aspects
KW  - Mass media
KW  - SOCIAL SCIENCE / Media Studies
KW  - bisacsh
KW  - Democracy, Elections, Media, Modernity, Myths, Political philosophy, Populism, Social surveys
N1  - Frontmatter --; Table of Contents --; Table of Contents --; List of Online Appendices --; Acknowledgments --; Introduction: Collective Speculation in Mediatized Populist Democracy --; Part 1 The Speculative Media System --; 1. Speculation and Liquidity in Mediatized Politics and Marketized Finance --; 2. The Rise of the Fifth Estate --; 3. Theorizing Collective Mythmaking on Media and Markets --; Part 2. The Cultural Autonomy of Neopopular Mythmaking --; Introduction to Part 2 --; 4. Mythicizing Popular Media in Academia --; 5. The Myth of “Active Control” in Media-Interpreting Industries --; Part 3. The Counterperformativity of Neopopular Mythmaking --; Introduction to Part 3 --; 6. When Being Popular Is Dangerous: The Case of a Myth- Driven Political Campaign --; 7. Latent Events in a Postnormal Media Environment --; Conclusion: The Dialectic of Liquid Modernity and the Crisis of Democracy --; Appendix --; References --; Index; restricted access
N2  - The common critique of media- and ratings-driven politics envisions democracy falling hostage to a popularity contest. By contrast, the following book reconceives politics as a speculative Keynesian beauty contest that alienates itself from the popular audience it ceaselessly targets. Political actors unknowingly lean on collective beliefs about the popular expectations they seek to gratify, and thus do not follow popular public opinion as it is, but popular public opinion about popular public opinion. This book unravels how collective discourses on “the popular” have taken the role of intermediary between political elites and electorates. The shift has been driven by the idea of “liquid control:” that postindustrial electorates should be reached through flexibly designed media campaigns based on a complete understanding of their media-immersed lives. Such a complex representation of popular electorates, actors have believed, cannot be secured by rigid bureaucratic parties, but has to be distilled from the collective wisdom of the crowd of consultants, pollsters, journalists and pundits commenting on the political process. The mediatization of political representation has run a strikingly similar trajectory to the marketization of capital allocation in finance: starting from a rejection of bureaucratic control, promising a more “liquid” alternative, attempting to detect a collective wisdom (of/about “the markets” and “the people”), and ending up in self-driven spirals of collective speculation
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1515/9789633861684
UR  - https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9789633861684
UR  - https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9789633861684/original
ER  -