TY - BOOK AU - Oreskes,Naomi AU - Edenhofer,Ottmar AU - Kowarsch,Martin AU - Krosnick,Jon A. AU - Lange,Marc AU - Lindee,Susan AU - Macedo,Stephen TI - Why Trust Science? T2 - The University Center for Human Values Series SN - 9780691222370 U1 - 501 23 PY - 2021///] CY - Princeton, NJ : PB - Princeton University Press, KW - Science KW - Philosophy KW - Social aspects KW - SCIENCE / Philosophy & Social Aspects KW - bisacsh KW - Adverse effect KW - Adviser KW - American Association for the Advancement of Science KW - Americans KW - Amgen KW - Authoritarianism KW - Biologist KW - Biomedicine KW - Blind experiment KW - Bruno Latour KW - Cambridge University Press KW - Climate change KW - Climatology KW - Continental drift KW - Covid-19 KW - Criticism KW - Decision-making KW - Dental floss KW - Distrust KW - Empirical evidence KW - Empiricism KW - Environmental impact assessment KW - Environmentalist KW - Epistemology KW - Eugenics KW - Experiment KW - Explanation KW - Fallacy KW - Funding of science KW - Funding KW - Geneticist KW - Global warming KW - Governance KW - Graduate school KW - Greenhouse gas KW - Helen Longino KW - History and philosophy of science KW - Ideology KW - Institution KW - Karl Popper KW - Lecture KW - Logical positivism KW - Ludwik Fleck KW - Merchants of Doubt KW - Methodology KW - Misuse of statistics KW - Morality KW - Naomi Oreskes KW - National Science Foundation KW - Ottmar Edenhofer KW - Paradigm shift KW - Pascal's Wager KW - Peer review KW - Philosopher KW - Philosophy of science KW - Physician KW - Physicist KW - Political psychology KW - Political science KW - Politics KW - Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research KW - Princeton University KW - Psychology KW - Public health KW - Public policy KW - Publication KW - Rationality KW - Reason KW - Replication crisis KW - Reproducibility KW - Result KW - Sandra Harding KW - Science studies KW - Science, technology and society KW - Scientific community KW - Scientific consensus KW - Scientific evidence KW - Scientific method KW - Scientific opinion on climate change KW - Scientific progress KW - Scientific revolution KW - Scientific theory KW - Scientist KW - Skepticism KW - Social science KW - Sociology KW - Statistical significance KW - Suggestion KW - Sunburn KW - Sunscreen KW - Symptom KW - Tax KW - Technology KW - Theory KW - Thomas Kuhn KW - Thought KW - Vaccination KW - Vetting N1 - Frontmatter --; CONTENTS --; Preface to the Paperback --; Acknowledgments --; Introduction --; Chapter 1 Why Trust Science? --; Chapter 2 Science Awry --; Coda --; Comments --; Chapter 3 The Epistemology of Frozen Peas --; Chapter 4 What Would Reasons for Trusting Science Be? --; Chapter 5 Pascal’s Wager Reframed --; Chapter 6 Comments on the Present and Future of Science, Inspired by Naomi Oreskes --; Response --; Chapter 7 Reply --; Afterword --; Notes --; References --; Contributors --; Index; restricted access N2 - Why the social character of scientific knowledge makes it trustworthyAre doctors right when they tell us vaccines are safe? Should we take climate experts at their word when they warn us about the perils of global warming? Why should we trust science when so many of our political leaders don't? Naomi Oreskes offers a bold and compelling defense of science, revealing why the social character of scientific knowledge is its greatest strength—and the greatest reason we can trust it. Tracing the history and philosophy of science from the late nineteenth century to today, this timely and provocative book features a new preface by Oreskes and critical responses by climate experts Ottmar Edenhofer and Martin Kowarsch, political scientist Jon Krosnick, philosopher of science Marc Lange, and science historian Susan Lindee, as well as a foreword by political theorist Stephen Macedo UR - https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691222370?locatt=mode:legacy UR - https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780691222370 UR - https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780691222370/original ER -