Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Compulsory Arbitration : The Grand Experiment in Employment / Richard A. Bales.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, [2019]Copyright date: ©1997Description: 1 online resource (248 p.)Content type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9781501733307
Subject(s): Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- One. An Introduction to Employment Arbitration -- Two. The Emergence of Compulsory Arbitration -- Three. The FAA “Contracts of Employment” Exclusion -- Four. Applicability of the FAA to Other Employment Laws -- Five. Employment Arbitration and the National Labor Relations Act -- Si.x The Role of the EEOC -- Seven. Compulsory Employment Arbitration in the Securities Industry -- Eight. Compulsory Arbitration as Part of a Broader Employment Dispute Resolution Process: The Brown & Root Example -- Nine. Creating a Fair (and Enforceable) Arbitration Agreement -- Ten. The Policy Implications of Compulsory Employment Arbitration -- Notes -- Index
Summary: This is the first book on a crucial issue in human resource management. In recent years, employers have begun to require, as a condition of employment, that their nonunion employees agree to arbitrate rather than litigate any employment disputes, including claims of discrimination. As the number of employers considering such a requirement soars, so does the fear that compulsory arbitration may eviscerate the statutory rights of employees. Richard A. Bales explains that the advantages of arbitration are clear. Much faster and less expensive than litigation, arbitration provides a forum for the many employees who are shut out of the current litigative system by the cost and by the tremendous backlog of cases. On the other hand, employers could use arbitration abusively. Bales views the current situation as an ongoing experiment. As long as the courts continue to enforce agreements that are fundamentally fair to employees, the experiment will continue. After tracing the history of employment arbitration in the nonunion sector, Bales explains how employment arbitration has actually worked in the securities industry and at Brown & Root, a company with a comprehensive dispute resolution process. He concludes by summarizing the advantages, disadvantages, and policy implications of adopting arbitration as the preeminent method of resolving disputes in the American workforce.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9781501733307

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- One. An Introduction to Employment Arbitration -- Two. The Emergence of Compulsory Arbitration -- Three. The FAA “Contracts of Employment” Exclusion -- Four. Applicability of the FAA to Other Employment Laws -- Five. Employment Arbitration and the National Labor Relations Act -- Si.x The Role of the EEOC -- Seven. Compulsory Employment Arbitration in the Securities Industry -- Eight. Compulsory Arbitration as Part of a Broader Employment Dispute Resolution Process: The Brown & Root Example -- Nine. Creating a Fair (and Enforceable) Arbitration Agreement -- Ten. The Policy Implications of Compulsory Employment Arbitration -- Notes -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

This is the first book on a crucial issue in human resource management. In recent years, employers have begun to require, as a condition of employment, that their nonunion employees agree to arbitrate rather than litigate any employment disputes, including claims of discrimination. As the number of employers considering such a requirement soars, so does the fear that compulsory arbitration may eviscerate the statutory rights of employees. Richard A. Bales explains that the advantages of arbitration are clear. Much faster and less expensive than litigation, arbitration provides a forum for the many employees who are shut out of the current litigative system by the cost and by the tremendous backlog of cases. On the other hand, employers could use arbitration abusively. Bales views the current situation as an ongoing experiment. As long as the courts continue to enforce agreements that are fundamentally fair to employees, the experiment will continue. After tracing the history of employment arbitration in the nonunion sector, Bales explains how employment arbitration has actually worked in the securities industry and at Brown & Root, a company with a comprehensive dispute resolution process. He concludes by summarizing the advantages, disadvantages, and policy implications of adopting arbitration as the preeminent method of resolving disputes in the American workforce.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)