Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Reconstruction Effects in Relative Clauses / ed. by Manfred Krifka, Mathias Schenner.

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Studia grammatica ; 75Publisher: Berlin ; Boston : De Gruyter (A), [2018]Copyright date: ©2019Description: 1 online resource (VI, 453 p.)Content type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9783050062747
  • 9783110380774
  • 9783050095158
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • P297 .R43 2019
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also in print.
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- An introduction to reconstruction effects in relative clauses -- A Direct Compositionality approach to Condition C effects under reconstruction and their exceptions -- Relative reconstructions -- A calculus for reconstruction and anti-reconstruction -- Notes on stress reconstruction and syntactic reconstruction -- A new version of the Matching Analysis of relative clauses -- Idioms as evidence for the proper analysis of relative clauses -- Some notes on connectivity and predicational copular sentences -- Functional readings without type-shifted noun phrases -- Deconstructing reconstruction -- Evaluation order, crossover, and reconstruction -- Telescoping by continuations -- Telescoping in relative clauses -- Intensional relative clauses and the semantics of variable objects
Summary: Reconstruction effects in relative clauses are a class of phenomena where the external head of the relative clause seems to behave as if it occupied a position within the relative clause, as far as some commonly accepted principle of grammar is concerned. An often cited type of example is “The [relative of his] [which every man admires most] is his mother.”, where the pronoun “his” in the relative head appears to be bound by the quantified noun phrase “every man” in the relative clause – although the latter does not c-command the former, which is commonly required for binding. Several solutions have been developed in various theoretical frameworks. One interesting aspect about reconstruction effects in relative clauses is that they can be used as a benchmark for competing theories of grammar: Which architecture of the syntax-semantics interface can provide the most satisfying explanation for these phenomena? This volume brings together researchers working in different frameworks but looking at the same set of empirical facts, enabling the reader to develop their own perspective on the perfect tradeoff between syntax and semantics in a theory of grammar.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9783050095158

Frontmatter -- Contents -- An introduction to reconstruction effects in relative clauses -- A Direct Compositionality approach to Condition C effects under reconstruction and their exceptions -- Relative reconstructions -- A calculus for reconstruction and anti-reconstruction -- Notes on stress reconstruction and syntactic reconstruction -- A new version of the Matching Analysis of relative clauses -- Idioms as evidence for the proper analysis of relative clauses -- Some notes on connectivity and predicational copular sentences -- Functional readings without type-shifted noun phrases -- Deconstructing reconstruction -- Evaluation order, crossover, and reconstruction -- Telescoping by continuations -- Telescoping in relative clauses -- Intensional relative clauses and the semantics of variable objects

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Reconstruction effects in relative clauses are a class of phenomena where the external head of the relative clause seems to behave as if it occupied a position within the relative clause, as far as some commonly accepted principle of grammar is concerned. An often cited type of example is “The [relative of his] [which every man admires most] is his mother.”, where the pronoun “his” in the relative head appears to be bound by the quantified noun phrase “every man” in the relative clause – although the latter does not c-command the former, which is commonly required for binding. Several solutions have been developed in various theoretical frameworks. One interesting aspect about reconstruction effects in relative clauses is that they can be used as a benchmark for competing theories of grammar: Which architecture of the syntax-semantics interface can provide the most satisfying explanation for these phenomena? This volume brings together researchers working in different frameworks but looking at the same set of empirical facts, enabling the reader to develop their own perspective on the perfect tradeoff between syntax and semantics in a theory of grammar.

Issued also in print.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 25. Jun 2024)