How Science Engages with Ethics and Why It Should : An Interdisciplinary Approach / ed. by Kristen Renwick Monroe.
Material type:
- 9783111449104
- 9783111143019
- 9783111142463
- 174.95
- online - DeGruyter
- Issued also in print.
Item type | Current library | Call number | URL | Status | Notes | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online | online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Online access | Not for loan (Accesso limitato) | Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users | (dgr)9783111142463 |
Frontmatter -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- Introduction -- Chapter 1 The Pragmatic Nature of Empirical Science -- Chapter 2 Ethics Training in Science: What We Miss in Health Research -- Chapter 3 When Things Go Wrong and Science Forgets About Ethics -- Chapter 4 Ethical Issues in Research with Human Subjects -- Chapter 5 Human Subjects Research: One Professional Association’s Attempt to Establish Fair Institutional Guidelines -- Chapter 6 Ethics in the COVID-19 Trenches: Research with Life and Death Implications and Limited Data Reliability -- Chapter 7 Ethics and Pseudoscience in Our Daily Lives: The Status of the Science Behind Dietary Supplements -- Chapter 8 Moral Cognition: An Introduction to the Field -- Chapter 9 The Social Psychology of Political Polarization -- Chapter 10 No Child Left Alone: Moral Judgments About Parents Affect Estimates of Risk to Children -- Chapter 11 Trust, Risk, and the Social Contract -- Chapter 12 Good Science Is Not Enough: The Misapplication of Science as Seen Through America’s Homelessness Crisis -- Chapter 13 Climate Change: Policies, Politics, Science, and Equitable Solutions? -- Contributors
restricted access online access with authorization star
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
We live in an era of extreme claims versus weak consensus on issues critical to the public. Is climate change a hoax, or is it destroying our planet? Were the vaccines and social distancing measures of COVID-19 designed to protect us, or were they an invasion of our liberty? How do we determine the validity of these claims and others like them? Can we find a reliable middle ground leading to policies that help everyone? How Science Engages with Ethics and Why It Should makes an impassioned plea for a scientific analysis of ethics, discussing what such a method is, why we need it, and what it can offer that other methods cannot. With contributions from leading thinkers across a range of disciplines, Part 1 explores the challenges facing scientists and how to establish ground rules that will both protect human subjects and guide researchers in the future. Part 2 explores the importance of evidence-based science for topics such as climate change, social care, political polarization and rational decision-making, showing how even good science can go wrong, at times contributing to disastrous effects. At the cutting edge of its discipline, How Science Engages with Ethics and Why It Should provides a compelling case for demanding evidence-based analysis to form the foundation of the discussions and policies that affect our very lives. With contributions by: Jeffrey Barratt, Peter Ditto, Jessica Maria Gonzalez, James W. Hicks, Mahtab Jafari, Rose McDermott, B.W. Sarnecka, Roxane Cohen Silver, Brian Skyrms, Teresa Sabol Spezio, Lawrence Sporty, Kyle Stanford, Ashley J. Thomas, James Tran, and the assistance of Ali Ansari, Kendrick Choi, Hannah Dastgheib, David Han, Nate Kang, Alexis Kim, Connor Lee, Michelle Lee, Lauren O’Neill, Samuel Shih, and Anqi Wang.
Issued also in print.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
In English.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 20. Nov 2024)