Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Theory Can Be More than It Used to Be : Learning Anthropology's Method in a Time of Transition / ed. by George E. Marcus, Dominic Boyer, James D. Faubion.

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublisher: Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, [2016]Copyright date: ©2016Description: 1 online resource (296 p.) : 5 halftones, 1 chartContent type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9781501700903
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 301.01 23
LOC classification:
  • GN33 .T44 2015eb
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Introduction: New Methodologies for a Transformed Discipline -- Part I. Ethnography, Fieldwork, Theorization -- 1 Portable Analytics and Lateral Theory -- 2 On Programmatics -- 3 The Ambitions of Theory Work in the Production of Contemporary Anthropological Research -- 4 Theorizing the Present Ethnographically -- 5 Trans-formations of Biology and of Theory -- Part II Pedagogy, Training, Analytical Method -- 7 Responses -- 8 Dialogue -- Afterword. On the Need to Reinvent Anthropological Teaching and Training in Theory -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Contributors -- Index
Summary: Within anthropology, as elsewhere in the human sciences, there is a tendency to divide knowledge making into two separate poles: conceptual (theory) vs. empirical (ethnography). In Theory Can Be More than It Used to Be, Dominic Boyer, James D. Faubion, and George E. Marcus argue that we need to take a step back from the assumption that we know what theory is to investigate how theory—a matter of concepts, of analytic practice, of medium of value, of professional ideology—operates in anthropology and related fields today. They have assembled a distinguished group of scholars to diagnose the state of the theory-ethnography divide in anthropology today and to explore alternative modes of analytical and pedagogical practice.Continuing the methodological insights provided in Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be, the contributors to this volume find that now is an optimal time to reflect on the status of theory in relation to ethnographic research in anthropology and kindred disciplines. Together they engage with questions such as, What passes for theory in anthropology and the human sciences today and why? What is theory’s relation to ethnography? How are students trained to identify and respect anthropological theorization and how do they practice theoretical work in their later career stages? What theoretical experiments, languages, and institutions are available to the human sciences? Throughout, the editors and authors consider theory in practical terms, rather than as an amorphous set of ideas, an esoteric discourse of power, a norm of intellectual life, or an infinitely contestable canon of texts. A short editorial afterword explores alternative ethics and institutions of pedagogy and training in theory.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9781501700903

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Introduction: New Methodologies for a Transformed Discipline -- Part I. Ethnography, Fieldwork, Theorization -- 1 Portable Analytics and Lateral Theory -- 2 On Programmatics -- 3 The Ambitions of Theory Work in the Production of Contemporary Anthropological Research -- 4 Theorizing the Present Ethnographically -- 5 Trans-formations of Biology and of Theory -- Part II Pedagogy, Training, Analytical Method -- 7 Responses -- 8 Dialogue -- Afterword. On the Need to Reinvent Anthropological Teaching and Training in Theory -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Contributors -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Within anthropology, as elsewhere in the human sciences, there is a tendency to divide knowledge making into two separate poles: conceptual (theory) vs. empirical (ethnography). In Theory Can Be More than It Used to Be, Dominic Boyer, James D. Faubion, and George E. Marcus argue that we need to take a step back from the assumption that we know what theory is to investigate how theory—a matter of concepts, of analytic practice, of medium of value, of professional ideology—operates in anthropology and related fields today. They have assembled a distinguished group of scholars to diagnose the state of the theory-ethnography divide in anthropology today and to explore alternative modes of analytical and pedagogical practice.Continuing the methodological insights provided in Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be, the contributors to this volume find that now is an optimal time to reflect on the status of theory in relation to ethnographic research in anthropology and kindred disciplines. Together they engage with questions such as, What passes for theory in anthropology and the human sciences today and why? What is theory’s relation to ethnography? How are students trained to identify and respect anthropological theorization and how do they practice theoretical work in their later career stages? What theoretical experiments, languages, and institutions are available to the human sciences? Throughout, the editors and authors consider theory in practical terms, rather than as an amorphous set of ideas, an esoteric discourse of power, a norm of intellectual life, or an infinitely contestable canon of texts. A short editorial afterword explores alternative ethics and institutions of pedagogy and training in theory.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 26. Apr 2024)