Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Security as Politics : Beyond the State of Exception / Andrew W. Neal.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, [2022]Copyright date: ©2019Description: 1 online resource (288 p.)Content type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9781474450928
  • 9781474450942
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 355.03 23
LOC classification:
  • UA10.5 .N43 2019eb
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- 1. In Defence of Politics against Security? -- 2. How Do We Know Security When We See It? Problematisation as Method -- 3. Securitisation and Politicisation -- 4. Politicians, Security Politics and the Political Game -- 5. Can One Person Make a Difference? Fearless Speech vs. Security Politics -- 6. Security as Normal Politics: The Rise of Security in Parliamentary Committees -- 7. Security as a Whole-of-Government Project: Risk, Economy, Politics -- Conclusion: More Security, More Politics -- Bibliography -- Index
Summary: Uses the perspective of parliamentarians to reassess the relationship between security and politicsReceived an honourable mention from the International Political Sociology section of the International Studies AssociationAndrew W. Neal argues that while ‘security’ was once an anti-political ‘exception’ in liberal democracies – a black box of secret intelligence and military decision-making at the dark heart of the state – it has now become normalised in professional political life. This represents a direct challenge to critical security studies debates and their core assumption that security is a kind of illiberal and undemocratic ‘anti-politics’. Using archival research and interviews with politicians, Neal investigates security politics from the 1980s to the present day to show how its meaning and practice have changed over time. In doing so, he develops an original reassessment of the security/politics relationship.Key FeaturesProduces an original perspective on security politics by engaging with debates in parliamentary studies and political science that have not previously been connected to securityTheoretically and empirically rethinks the relationship between security and politicsChallenges founding assumptions in critical security studies and securitisation theory about the pathological relationship between security and politicsExamines the history of legislative/executive relations on securityArgues that security is being normalised politically, migrating from the realm of exceptional politics to one of ‘normal politics’
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9781474450942

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- 1. In Defence of Politics against Security? -- 2. How Do We Know Security When We See It? Problematisation as Method -- 3. Securitisation and Politicisation -- 4. Politicians, Security Politics and the Political Game -- 5. Can One Person Make a Difference? Fearless Speech vs. Security Politics -- 6. Security as Normal Politics: The Rise of Security in Parliamentary Committees -- 7. Security as a Whole-of-Government Project: Risk, Economy, Politics -- Conclusion: More Security, More Politics -- Bibliography -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Uses the perspective of parliamentarians to reassess the relationship between security and politicsReceived an honourable mention from the International Political Sociology section of the International Studies AssociationAndrew W. Neal argues that while ‘security’ was once an anti-political ‘exception’ in liberal democracies – a black box of secret intelligence and military decision-making at the dark heart of the state – it has now become normalised in professional political life. This represents a direct challenge to critical security studies debates and their core assumption that security is a kind of illiberal and undemocratic ‘anti-politics’. Using archival research and interviews with politicians, Neal investigates security politics from the 1980s to the present day to show how its meaning and practice have changed over time. In doing so, he develops an original reassessment of the security/politics relationship.Key FeaturesProduces an original perspective on security politics by engaging with debates in parliamentary studies and political science that have not previously been connected to securityTheoretically and empirically rethinks the relationship between security and politicsChallenges founding assumptions in critical security studies and securitisation theory about the pathological relationship between security and politicsExamines the history of legislative/executive relations on securityArgues that security is being normalised politically, migrating from the realm of exceptional politics to one of ‘normal politics’

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jun 2022)