Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

The Value of Money / Prabhat Patnaik.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: New York, NY : Columbia University Press, [2009]Copyright date: ©2009Description: 1 online resource (280 p.)Content type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9780231146760
  • 9780231519212
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 332.401 22
LOC classification:
  • HG220.A2 P38 2009
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also in print.
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- 1. The Great Divide in Economics -- Part 1. The Infirmity of Monetarism -- 2. The Monetarist Theory -- 3. Equilibrium and Historical Time -- 4. The Modus Operandi of Monetarist Theory -- 5. The Cash Transactions Approach to Monetarism -- 6. An Excursus on Rational-Expectation Equilibria -- 7. An Excursus on Methodological Individualism -- 8. An Excursus on Walrasian Equilibrium and Capitalist Production -- Part 2. The Superiority of Propertyism -- 9. A Critique of Ricardo's Theory of Money -- 10. Marx on the Value of Money -- 11. An Excursus on Marx's Theory of Value -- 12. Marx's Solution to a Dilemma -- 13. Alternative Interpretations of Keynes -- 14. A Digression on a Keynesian Dilemma -- 15. Marx, Keynes, and Propertyism -- Part 3. The Incompleteness of Propertyism -- 16. The Incompleteness of Propertyism -- 17. A Solution to the Incompleteness -- 18. Capitalism as a Mode of Production -- 19. Money in the World Economy -- 20. Capitalism and Imperialism -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index
Summary: Why is money more valuable than the paper on which it is printed? Monetarists link the value of money to its supply and demand, believing the latter depends on the total value of the commodities it circulates. According to Prabhat Patnaik, this logic is flawed. In his view, in any nonbarter economy, the value we assign to money is determined independently of its supply and demand.Through an original and provocative critique of monetarism, Patnaik advances a revolutionary understanding of macroeconomics that highlights the "propertyist" position of Karl Marx and John Maynard Keynes. Unlike the usual division between "classical" economists (e.g., David Ricardo and Marx) and the "marginalists" (e.g., Carl Menger, William Stanley Jevons, and Léon Walras), Patnaik places "monetarists," including Ricardo, on one side, while grouping propertyist writers like Marx, Keynes, and Rosa Luxemburg on the other. This second group subscribes to the idea that the value of money is given from outside the realm of supply and demand, therefore making money a form in which wealth is held. The fact that money is held as wealth in turn gives rise to the possibility of deficiency of aggregate demand under capitalism. It is no accident that this possibility was highlighted by Marx and Keynes while going largely unrecognized by Ricardo and contemporary monetarists. At the same time, Patnaik points to a weakness in the Marx-Keynes tradition—namely, its lack of any satisfactory explanation of why the value of money, determined from outside the realm of supply and demand, remains relatively stable over long stretches of time. The answer to this question lies in the fact that capitalism is not a self-contained system but is born from a precapitalist setting with which it interacts and where it creates massive labor reserves that, in turn, impart stability to the value of money. Patnaik's theory of money, then, is also a theory of imperialism, and he concludes with a discussion of the contemporary international monetary system, which he terms the "oil-dollar" standard.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9780231519212

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- 1. The Great Divide in Economics -- Part 1. The Infirmity of Monetarism -- 2. The Monetarist Theory -- 3. Equilibrium and Historical Time -- 4. The Modus Operandi of Monetarist Theory -- 5. The Cash Transactions Approach to Monetarism -- 6. An Excursus on Rational-Expectation Equilibria -- 7. An Excursus on Methodological Individualism -- 8. An Excursus on Walrasian Equilibrium and Capitalist Production -- Part 2. The Superiority of Propertyism -- 9. A Critique of Ricardo's Theory of Money -- 10. Marx on the Value of Money -- 11. An Excursus on Marx's Theory of Value -- 12. Marx's Solution to a Dilemma -- 13. Alternative Interpretations of Keynes -- 14. A Digression on a Keynesian Dilemma -- 15. Marx, Keynes, and Propertyism -- Part 3. The Incompleteness of Propertyism -- 16. The Incompleteness of Propertyism -- 17. A Solution to the Incompleteness -- 18. Capitalism as a Mode of Production -- 19. Money in the World Economy -- 20. Capitalism and Imperialism -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Why is money more valuable than the paper on which it is printed? Monetarists link the value of money to its supply and demand, believing the latter depends on the total value of the commodities it circulates. According to Prabhat Patnaik, this logic is flawed. In his view, in any nonbarter economy, the value we assign to money is determined independently of its supply and demand.Through an original and provocative critique of monetarism, Patnaik advances a revolutionary understanding of macroeconomics that highlights the "propertyist" position of Karl Marx and John Maynard Keynes. Unlike the usual division between "classical" economists (e.g., David Ricardo and Marx) and the "marginalists" (e.g., Carl Menger, William Stanley Jevons, and Léon Walras), Patnaik places "monetarists," including Ricardo, on one side, while grouping propertyist writers like Marx, Keynes, and Rosa Luxemburg on the other. This second group subscribes to the idea that the value of money is given from outside the realm of supply and demand, therefore making money a form in which wealth is held. The fact that money is held as wealth in turn gives rise to the possibility of deficiency of aggregate demand under capitalism. It is no accident that this possibility was highlighted by Marx and Keynes while going largely unrecognized by Ricardo and contemporary monetarists. At the same time, Patnaik points to a weakness in the Marx-Keynes tradition—namely, its lack of any satisfactory explanation of why the value of money, determined from outside the realm of supply and demand, remains relatively stable over long stretches of time. The answer to this question lies in the fact that capitalism is not a self-contained system but is born from a precapitalist setting with which it interacts and where it creates massive labor reserves that, in turn, impart stability to the value of money. Patnaik's theory of money, then, is also a theory of imperialism, and he concludes with a discussion of the contemporary international monetary system, which he terms the "oil-dollar" standard.

Issued also in print.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)