000			06038cam a2200673 a 4500
001			170364
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20250106141116.0
006			m o d
007			cr |n|---|||||
008			120528s2012 ne ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aEBLCP _beng _epn _cEBLCP _dOCLCQ _dN$T _dORZ _dE7B _dOCLCQ _dYDXCP _dCDX _dUIU _dOCLCQ _dIDEBK _dCOO _dOCLCQ _dAZK _dLOA _dCOCUF _dMOR _dZCU _dOCLCQ _dMERUC _dOCLCQ _dU3W _dBETBC _dOCLCF _dSTF _dWRM _dVTS _dNRAMU _dICG _dVT2 _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dWYU _dTKN _dLEAUB _dDKC _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCL
019			_a892992158 _a961620414 _a962605000
020			_a9789004227996 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a9004227997 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a1280496215 _q(ebk)
020			_a9781280496219 _q(ebk)
020			_a900422419X
020			_a9789004224193
029	1		_aAU@ _b000051046022
029	1		_aCHBIS _b010205485
029	1		_aDEBBG _bBV044165466
029	1		_aNZ1 _b15913005
035			_a(OCoLC)794328554 _z(OCoLC)892992158 _z(OCoLC)961620414 _z(OCoLC)962605000
037			_a359144 _bMIL
050		4	_aBT213 _b.G54 2012eb
072		7	_aREL _x067040 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aBT _2lcco
082	0	4	_a232.09015
084			_aonline - EBSCO
100	1		_aGleede, Benjamin.
245	1	4	_aThe development of the term [enypostatos] from Origen to John of Damascus / _cby Benjamin Gleede.
260			_aLeiden ; _aBoston : _bBrill, _c2012.
300			_a1 online resource (vii, 210 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aSupplements to Vigiliae Christianae ; _vv. 113
500			_aOn t.p. "enypostatos" appears in the Greek alphabet.
500			_aRevision of the author's thesis (MA)--Durham University, 2004.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 189-200) and indexes.
505	0		_aAcknowledgements; Abbreviations; Introduction; Part I. The Pre-Neochalcedonian enupostatos-Tradition; 1. The Origin of the Term; 1.1. Basic Considerations; 1.2. Enupostatos -- A Genuinely Christian Theological Term; 1.2.1. Irenaeus?; 1.2.2. Origen; 1.2.3. Origin and the Genuine Meaning(s) of the Term; 2. Enupostatos as a Technical Term of Trinitarian Theology; 2.1. The Rise and Development of a Technical Usage during the Arian Controversy; 2.1.1. A First Instance of Theological Relevance: The Letter of the Six Bishops. 2.1.2. A 'Third Kind' of Logos: proforikos, endiathetos, enupostatos2.1.3. The Hypostatical Independence of the Logos in the Creeds; 2.2. The Establishment of the Technical Usage in Late Fourth- and Early Fifth-Century Authors; 2.2.1. Ps-Athanasius and Didymus; 2.2.2. Epiphanius of Salamis; 2.2.3. John Chrysostom; 2.2.4. Cyril of Alexandria; Part II. The Christological Application of enupostatos; Introduction; 3. enupostatos, the 'Insubsistence Formula', Their Connection and Relevance for Post-Chalcedonian Christology during the Sixth-Century Debate. 3.1. John the Grammarian and the Introduction of enupostatos into the Christological Debate3.1.1. Enupostatos and Insubsistence in JohnÕs Apology for Chalcedon; 3.1.2. Background and Possible Sources; 3.2. Leontius of Byzantium and the Distinction between enupostaton and hupostasis; 3.2.1. Interpreting the ÔLocus ClassicusÕ; 3.2.2. Leontius and the Insubsistence Formula; 3.3. Philosophical Excursus: The Distinctio kath' hauto -- en alloi, the Problem of Substantial Qualities and Inexisting Natures; 3.3.1. Origin and Problems of the Distinction. 3.3.2. Attempted Solutions in the Later Commentaries on Aristotle3.3.3. Inherence of Accidents; 3.3.4. Inherence of Substantial Parts (Specific Differences, Substantial Qualities); 3.3.5. Inherence of Genera and Species; 3.3.5.1. The Problem of Participation; 3.3.5.2. The Problem of Individuation and Immattered Forms; 3.4. Ephrem of Amid; 3.5. Pamphilus the Theologian; 3.5.1. Pamphilus Reading Leontius of Byzantium; 3.5.2. Complementary Neochalcedonian Arguments: Pamphilus and the Insubsistence Formula. 3.6. De sectis, Anastasius of Antioch and the Christological Disadvantages of the Common Usage3.6.1. De sectis, Praxis VII; 3.6.2. Anastasius I. of Antioch, the Disadvantages of the Common Usage and the Systematical Problems of Insubsistence-Christology; 3.7. Leontius of Jerusalem; 3.7.1. Leontius' Usage of enupostatos; 3.7.2. Leontius and the Insubsistence Formula; 4. enupostatos, the 'Insubsistence Formula', Their Connection and Relevance for the Culmination of Chalcedonian Christological Thought; 4.1. Maximus the Confessor; 4.1.1. Maximus' Usage of enupostatos. 4.1.2. The Insubsistence Formula in Maximus.
520			_aExamining the usage of the term enypostatos throughout the Patristic period, this study illustrates the gradual change in its meaning from stressing the hypostatical independence of the trinitarian persons to upholding the reality of Christ's two natures in his unique hypostasis.
588	0		_aPrint version record.
600	0	0	_aJesus Christ _xNatures _xHistory of doctrines _yEarly church, ca. 30-600.
600	0	0	_aJesus Christ _xHistory of doctrines _yEarly church, ca. 30-600. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85070031
600	0	6	_aJésus-Christ _xHistoire des doctrines _yca 30-600 (Église primitive)
600	0	7	_aJesus Christ _2fast _1https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcWtWBVPTkM6wHtfK3mh3
650		0	_aHypostatic union _xHistory of doctrines _yEarly church, ca. 30-600.
650		7	_aRELIGION _xChristian Theology _xChristology. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aTheology, Doctrinal _2fast
648		7	_a30-600 _2fast
655		7	_aHistory _2fast
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aGleede, Benjamin. _tDevelopment of the Term enypostatos from Origen to John of Damascus. _dLeiden : Brill, ©2012 _z9789004224193
830		0	_aSupplements to Vigiliae Christianae ; _vv. 113. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86735737
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=456875
942			_cEB
999			_c170364 _d170364