000			03930cam a2200541 i 4500
001			170870
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20250106141347.0
006			m o d
007			cr cnu---unuuu
008			140902s2011 oru ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aN$T _beng _erda _epn _cN$T _dYDXCP _dOCLCQ _dVTS _dSTF _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCL
020			_a9781621893578 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a162189357X _q(electronic bk.)
020			_z1608997707
020			_z9781608997701
029	1		_aAU@ _b000056598372
035			_a(OCoLC)889814831
050		4	_aBT40 _b.K54 2011eb
072		7	_aREL _x067110 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aREL _x070000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a230.01 _223
084			_aonline - EBSCO
100	1		_aKlassen, Justin D.
245	1	4	_aThe paradox of hope : _btheology and the problem of nihilism / _cby Justin D. Klassen.
264		1	_aEugene, Or. : _bCascade Books, _c©2011.
300			_a1 online resource (viii, 254 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 247-252) and index.
505	0		_aContemporary theology and the turn to rhetoric -- Language and the fear of death -- Consummation or complication? -- Cultural logic and Christian sociality -- Love's obstinate hope.
520			_aIn contemporary public discourse, the supposedly comprehensive explanatory power of reason is used to justify a thoroughgoing suspicion of religion. In recent decades, the critiques of postmodernism have generated a different kind of suspicion by construing history as a process that is too arbitrary to be narrated--either by modern reason or by religion. In light of these developments, a question arises regarding the appropriate theological response to such forms of suspicion, both of which threaten not just religion but our sense of human agency as such. Does the retrieval of a meaningful religious subjectivity in a climate of suspicion demand a renewed emphasis upon theology's rhetorical persuasiveness, as Radical Orthodoxy has recently proposed? Or does identifying the believing subject with theology's "grammar" fail to attend to some of the challenges posed by such suspicion? The Paradox of Hope answers these questions in an original and provocative way by clarifying the complex relationship between post-secular theology and the work of Søren Kierkegaard. Ultimately, Klassen argues that Kierkegaard's influence is crucial, albeit obscured, in current post-secular theological imperatives, and that the Dane's eschewal of persuasion in favor of hope's inexplicable resolve provides a more adequate response to the nihilism of contemporary suspicion than do the rhetorical proposals currently on offer. In light of this argument, The Paradox of Hope also rehabilitates some of the voices typically excluded by contemporary theology's rhetoric, including those of Heidegger, Derrida, and Levinas
588	0		_aPrint version record.
650		0	_aPhilosophical theology. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85100848
650		0	_aPostmodern theology. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2001001930
650		6	_aThéologie philosophique.
650		6	_aThéologie postmoderne.
650		7	_aRELIGION _xChristian Theology _xSystematic. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aRELIGION _xChristianity _xGeneral. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aPhilosophical theology _2fast
650		7	_aPostmodern theology _2fast
758			_ihas work: _aThe paradox of hope (Text) _1https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGxjYR6v996Q3THbMpYYxC _4https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aKlassen, Justin D. _tParadox of hope _z1608997707 _w(DLC) 2011275576 _w(OCoLC)768985301
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=833506
942			_cEB
999			_c170870 _d170870