000			06348cam a2200697Ma 4500
001			172140
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20250106141234.0
006			m o d
007			cr cn|||||||||
008			130717s2010 gw ob 001 0deng d
040			_aE7B _beng _epn _cE7B _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dYDXCP _dCOO _dOCLCF _dNLGGC _dEBLCP _dN$T _dDEBBG _dOCLCQ _dLOA _dCOCUF _dPIFAG _dZCU _dMERUC _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dU3W _dSTF _dWRM _dVTS _dNRAMU _dICG _dVT2 _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dTKN _dDKC _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dUWK _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCL _dSXB _dOCLCQ
019			_a851972128 _a961669684 _a962587206
020			_a9783110324624 _q(e-book)
020			_a3110324628 _q(e-book)
020			_a3868380752
020			_a9783868380750
020			_a3110324385
020			_a9783110324389
020			_z9783868380750
020			_z9783110324389
029	1		_aAU@ _b000053309288
029	1		_aAU@ _b000054994178
029	1		_aDEBBG _bBV042349282
029	1		_aDEBBG _bBV044176297
029	1		_aNZ1 _b15589200
029	1		_aAU@ _b000070014033
035			_a(OCoLC)854568842 _z(OCoLC)851972128 _z(OCoLC)961669684 _z(OCoLC)962587206
050		4	_aBT103 _b.W45 2010eb
072		7	_aREL _x067070 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a212/.1 _223
084			_aonline - EBSCO
084			_aCE 4715
100	1		_aWeingartner, Paul.
245	1	0	_aGod's existence, can it be proven? : _ba logical commentary on the five ways of Thomas Aquinas / _cPaul Weingartner.
260			_aFrankfurt : _bOntos Verlag, _c2010.
300			_a1 online resource (116 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aMetaphysical research ; _vBd. 10
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_a1. The Five Ways: Preliminary Questions; 1.1 Whether the Existence of God is Self-Evident?; 1.1.1 Text: Thomas Aquinas' Answer; 1.1.2 Commentary on the Answer; 1.1.2.1 Definition of Self-Evident Proposition; 1.1.2.2 Is God Exists Self-Evident to Us?; 1.1.3 Commentary to the Objections; 1.1.3.1 Is the Knowledge of God Naturally Implanted in All?; 1.1.3.2 Is the Existence of Primal Truth Self-Evident?; 1.1.3.3 Thomas Aquinas ́ Commentary on the Ontological Argument; 1.2 Whether it Can Be Demonstrated that God Exists?; 1.2.1 Text: Thomas Aquinas' Answer; 1.2.2 Commentary on the Answer.
505	8		_a1.2.2.1 Two Types of Demonstration1.2.2.2 The Cause as Necessary Condition for the Effects; 1.2.2.3 From God's Effects to His Existence; 1.2.2.4 Is it Necessary to Assume a Cause for the World (Universe) which is Outside the World (Universe)?; 1.2.3 Commentary on the Objections; 1.2.3.1 Is the Existence of God an Article of Faith?; 1.2.3.2 Does One Need a Definition of God for Understanding His Existence?; 1.2.3.3 Are God's Effects Proportional for a Demonstration of His Existence?; 2. The Five Ways; 2.1 The First Way; 2.1.1 The Latin Text and its Translation into English.
505	8		_a2.1.2 The Premises and Conclusions of the Text2.1.3 Reconstruction; 2.1.4 Commentary; 2.1.4.1 A Problem with Premise 6; 2.1.4.2 Different Meanings of Movetur -- 2.1.4.3 Definition of the First Mover; 2.2 The Second Way; 2.2.1 The Latin Text and its Translation into English; 2.2.2 The Premises and Conclusions of the Text; 2.2.3 Reconstruction; 2.2.4 Commentary; 2.2.4.1 Irreflexivity of the Causal Relation; 2.2.4.2 Cause as a Necessary Condition; 2.2.4.3 Transitivity; 2.2.4.4 Definition of the First Cause; 2.2.4.5 Infinite Regress; 2.3 The Third Way.
505	8		_a2.3.1 The Latin Text and its Translation into English2.3.2 The premises and conclusions of the text; 2.3.3. Reconstruction; 2.3.4 Commentary; 2.3.4.1 The Concept of Necessity Used in the Third Way; 2.3.4.2 The Concept of Necessity in Relation to Time; 2.3.4.3 Aristotle's view according to Thomas Aquinas; 2.3.4.4 Thomas Aquina ́s Premises and Conclusions in the Third Way; 2.4 The Fourth Way; 2.4.1 The Latin Text and its Translation into English; 2.4.2 The Premises and Conclusions of the Text; 2.4.3 Reconstruction; 2.4.4 Commentary; 2.4.4.1 Premise 2.
505	8		_a2.4.4.2 The Definition which Connects Perfection with Being (Premise 5. of 2.4.3)2.4.4.3 The Most Perfect Thing is the Cause of All Perfection; 2.5 The Fifth Way; 2.5.1 The Latin Text and its Translation into English; 2.5.2 The Premises and Conclusions of the Text; 2.5.3 Reconstruction; 2.5.4 Commentary; 2.5.4.1 Natural Beings Lacking Intelligence; 2.5.4.2 The Question of the Validity of the Argument; 2.6 The Question of the Uniqueness in the Conclusions of the Five Ways; 2.6.1 First Question; 2.6.2 Second Question; 2.7 Commentary to the Objections; References.
520			_aThe aim of the book is to show that the Five Ways of Thomas Aquinas, i.e. his five arguments to prove the existence of God, are logically correct arguments by the standards of modern Predicate Logic. In the first chapter this is done by commenting on the two preliminary articles preceeding the Five Ways in which Thomas Aquinas points out that on the one hand the existence of God is not self-evident to us and on the other hand, that, similar as in some scientific explanations, the mere existence of a cause for an effect which is evidently known to us can be proved. In the second chapter every a.
600	0	7	_aThomas Aquinas, _csanto, _dcirca 1225-1274 _2sbaa _1http://viaf.org/viaf/100910150 _912066
600	0	7	_aThomas, _cAquinas, Saint, _d1225?-1274 _2fast _1https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJyMkPRmyFpxV4XVwgRVG3
650		0	_aGod _xProof. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85055549
650		6	_aDieu _xExistence.
650		7	_aRELIGION _xChristian Theology _xEthics. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aGod _xProof _2fast
758			_ihas work: _aGod's existence, can it be proven? (Text) _1https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGCjHYhxR3XxWDW9yt9B6C _4https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aWeingartner, Paul. _tGod ́s Existence. Can it be Proven? : A Logical Commentary on the Five Ways of Thomas Aquinas. _dBerlin : De Gruyter, ©2010 _z9783110324389
830		0	_aMetaphysical research ; _vBd. 10. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2004078586
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=603576
942			_cEB
999			_c172140 _d172140