000			03815nam a22005055i 4500
001			183887
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20250106150215.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			241120t20152015nyu fo d z eng d
020			_a9780231175647 _qprint
020			_a9780231540278 _qPDF
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780231540278
035			_a(DE-B1597)458563
035			_a(OCoLC)979969603
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aDS62.8 _b.Y66 2015
072		7	_aPOL059000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a956.05
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aYom, Sean _eautore
245	1	0	_aFrom Resilience to Revolution : _bHow Foreign Interventions Destabilize the Middle East / _cSean Yom.
264		1	_aNew York, NY : _bColumbia University Press, _c[2015]
264		4	_c2015
300			_a1 online resource (312 p.) : _b10 figures
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	0		_aColumbia Studies in Middle East Politics
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tA Note on Transliteration and Interviews -- _tAcknowledgments -- _t1. The Argument and the Cases -- _t2. Coalitions, State-Building, and Geopolitical Mediation -- _t3. Conflict and Compromise in Kuwait -- _t4. Inclusion and Stability in a Populist Autocracy -- _t5. Cliency and Coercion in Iran -- _t6. Exclusionary Politics and the Revolutionary End -- _t7. A Conflict Interrupted in Jordan -- _t8. Recurrent Tensions and Tenuous Survival Under Hashemite Rule -- _t9. The Geopolitical Origins of Durable Political Order -- _tNotes -- _tBibliography -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aBased on comparative historical analyses of Iran, Jordan, and Kuwait, Sean L. Yom examines the foreign interventions, coalitional choices, and state outcomes that made the political regimes of the modern Middle East. A key text for foreign policy scholars, From Resilience to Revolution shows how outside interference can corrupt the most basic choices of governance: who to reward, who to punish, who to compensate, and who to manipulate.As colonial rule dissolved in the 1930s and 1950s, Middle Eastern autocrats constructed new political states to solidify their reigns, with varying results. Why did equally ambitious authoritarians meet such unequal fates? Yom ties the durability of Middle Eastern regimes to their geopolitical origins. At the dawn of the postcolonial era, many autocratic states had little support from their people and struggled to overcome widespread opposition. When foreign powers intervened to bolster these regimes, they unwittingly sabotaged the prospects for long-term stability by discouraging leaders from reaching out to their people and bargaining for mass support—early coalitional decisions that created repressive institutions and planted the seeds for future unrest. Only when they were secluded from larger geopolitical machinations did Middle Eastern regimes come to grips with their weaknesses and build broader coalitions.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 20. Nov 2024)
650		0	_aAuthoritarianism _zMiddle East _xHistory _y20th century.
650		0	_aPolitical stability _zMiddle East _xHistory _y20th century.
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / World / Middle Eastern. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780231540278
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780231540278/original
942			_cEB
999			_c183887 _d183887