000			04247nam a22005775i 4500
001			184401
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214232123.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			220302t20192019nyu fo d z eng d
010			_a2018045069
020			_a9780231189705 _qprint
020			_a9780231548472 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.7312/herb18970 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780231548472
035			_a(DE-B1597)526839
035			_a(OCoLC)1054266450
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050	1	0	_aE185.61
050		4	_aE185.61 _b.H495 2019
072		7	_aBUS023000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a305.8009756/0904 _223
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aHerbin-Triant, Elizabeth A. _eautore
245	1	0	_aThreatening Property : _bRace, Class, and Campaigns to Legislate Jim Crow Neighborhoods / _cElizabeth A. Herbin-Triant.
264		1	_aNew York, NY : _bColumbia University Press, _c[2019]
264		4	_c©2019
300			_a1 online resource
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	0		_aColumbia Studies in the History of U.S. Capitalism
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIntroduction -- _t1. Middling Whites in Postbellum North Carolina -- _t2. Fusion, Democrats, and the Scarecrow of Race -- _t3. Inspirations for Residential Segregation -- _t4. Separating Residences in the Camel City -- _t5. Jim Crow for the Countryside -- _tConclusion: Planning for Residential Segregation After Buchanan -- _tNotes -- _tBibliography -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aWhite supremacists determined what African Americans could do and where they could go in the Jim Crow South, but they were less successful in deciding where black people could live because different groups of white supremacists did not agree on the question of residential segregation. In Threatening Property, Elizabeth A. Herbin-Triant investigates early-twentieth-century campaigns for residential segregation laws in North Carolina to show how the version of white supremacy supported by middle-class white people differed from that supported by the elites. Class divides prevented Jim Crow from expanding to the extent that it would require separate neighborhoods for black and white southerners as in apartheid South Africa.Herbin-Triant details the backlash against the economic successes of African Americans among middle-class whites, who claimed that they wished to protect property values and so campaigned for residential segregation laws both in the city and the countryside, where their actions were modeled on South Africa's Natives Land Act. White elites blocked these efforts, primarily because it was against their financial interest to remove the black workers that they employed in their homes, farms, and factories. Herbin-Triant explores what the split over residential segregation laws reveals about competing versions of white supremacy and about the position of middling whites in a region dominated by elite planters and businessmen. An illuminating work of social and political history, Threatening Property puts class front and center in explaining conflict over the expansion of segregation laws into private property.
530			_aIssued also in print.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)
650		0	_aAfrican Americans _xSegregation _zNorth Carolina _xHistory _y20th century.
650		0	_aDiscrimination in housing _zNorth Carolina _xHistory _y20th century.
650		0	_aSocial classes _zNorth Carolina _xHistory _y20th century.
650		7	_aBUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economic History. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.7312/herb18970
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780231548472
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780231548472/original
942			_cEB
999			_c184401 _d184401