000 04151nam a2200565 454500
001 184919
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20250106150227.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 240625t20202020nyu fo d z eng d
020 _a9780231185080
_qprint
020 _a9780231851176
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.7312/mora18508
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9780231851176
035 _a(DE-B1597)546067
035 _a(OCoLC)1138676974
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aPN1995.9.G37
_bM67 2020eb
072 7 _aPER004110
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a791.43/658405318
_223
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aMorag, Raya
_eautore
245 1 0 _aPerpetrator Cinema :
_bConfronting Genocide in Cambodian Documentary /
_cRaya Morag.
264 1 _aNew York, NY :
_bColumbia University Press,
_c[2020]
264 4 _c©2020
300 _a1 online resource :
_b20 film stills
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aNonfictions
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tCONTENTS --
_tPREFACE --
_tACKNOWLEDGMENTS --
_tABBREVIATIONS --
_t1. DEFINING PERPETRATOR CINEMA --
_t2. POST– KHMER ROUGE CAMBODIAN CINEMA AND THE BIG PERPETRATORS: RECONCILIATION OR RESENTMENT? --
_t3. PERPETRATORHOOD PARADIGMS: THE DUEL AND MORAL RESENTMENT --
_t4. GENDERED GENOCIDE: THE FEMALE PERPETRATOR, FORCED MARRIAGE, AND RAPE --
_tEPILOGUE: THE ERA OF PERPETRATOR ETHICS --
_tNOTES --
_tFILMOGRAPHY --
_tBIBLIOGRAPHY --
_tINDEX
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aPerpetrator Cinema explores a new trend in the cinematic depiction of genocide that has emerged in Cambodian documentary in the late twentieth- and early twenty-first centuries. While past films documenting the Holocaust and genocides in Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and elsewhere have focused on collecting and foregrounding the testimony of survivors and victims, the intimate horror of the autogenocide enables post–Khmer Rouge Cambodian documentarians to propose a direct confrontation between the first-generation survivor and the perpetrator of genocide. These films break with Western tradition and disrupt the political view that reconciliation is the only legitimate response to atrocities of the past. Rather, transcending the perpetrator’s typical denial or partial confession, this extraordinary form of “duel” documentary creates confrontational tension and opens up the possibility of a transformation in power relations, allowing viewers to access feelings of moral resentment.Raya Morag examines works by Rithy Panh, Rob Lemkin and Thet Sambath, and Lida Chan and Guillaume Suon, among others, to uncover the ways in which filmmakers endeavor to allow the survivors’ moral status and courage to guide viewers to a new, more complete understanding of the processes of coming to terms with the past. These documentaries show how moral resentment becomes a way to experience, symbolize, judge, and finally incorporate evil into a system of ethics. Morag’s analysis reveals how perpetrator cinema provides new epistemic tools and propels the recent social-cultural-psychological shift from the era of the witness to the era of the perpetrator.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 25. Jun 2024)
650 0 _aDocumentary films
_zCambodia
_xHistory and criticism.
650 0 _aGenocide in motion pictures.
650 0 _aGenocide
_zCambodia.
650 0 _aMass murderers
_zCambodia
_xPsychology.
650 0 _aPolitical atrocities
_zCambodia.
650 7 _aPERFORMING ARTS / Film / Genres / Documentary.
_2bisacsh
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.7312/mora18508
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780231851176
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780231851176/original
942 _cEB
999 _c184919
_d184919