000 04480nam a22005175i 4500
001 187071
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214232309.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 210830t20212008pau fo d z eng d
020 _a9780271035000
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9780271035000
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9780271035000
035 _a(DE-B1597)583659
035 _a(OCoLC)1253313772
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aKF4541
_b.G37 2008eb
072 7 _aLAW018000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a342.7302/9
_222
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aGarry, Patrick M.
_eautore
245 1 3 _aAn Entrenched Legacy :
_bHow the New Deal Constitutional Revolution Continues to Shape the Role of the Supreme Court /
_cPatrick M. Garry.
264 1 _aUniversity Park, PA :
_bPenn State University Press,
_c[2021]
264 4 _c©2008
300 _a1 online resource (200 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tIntroduction --
_t1 The New Deal Constitutional Revolution --
_t2 At the Heart of the Revolution: The Constitution's Structural Provisions --
_t3 How the Administrative State Has Boosted Judicial Power --
_t4 The Court's Federalism Revolution --
_t5 A One-Sided Federalism Revolution: Ignoring the Liberty Side of Federalism --
_t6 Contradicting the Federalism Revolution: The Court's Nationalizing Rights-Jurisprudence --
_tConclusion: A Stifling of the Democratic Process --
_tIndex
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aAn Entrenched Legacy takes a fresh look at the role of the Supreme Court in our modern constitutional system. Although criticisms of judicial power today often attribute its rise to the activism of justices seeking to advance particular political ideologies, Patrick Garry argues instead that the Supreme Court's power has grown mainly because of certain constitutional decisions during the New Deal era that initially seemed to portend a lessening of the Court's power. When the Court retreated from enforcing separation of powers and federalism as the twin structural protections for individual liberty in the face of FDR's New Deal agenda, it was inevitably drawn into an alternative approach, substantive due process, as a means for protecting individual rights. This has led to many controversial judicial rulings, particularly regarding the recognition and enforcement of privacy rights. It has also led to the mistaken belief that the judiciary serves as the only protection of liberty and that an inherent conflict exists between individual liberty and majoritarian rule. Moreover, because the Court has assumed sole responsibility for preserving liberty, the whole area of individual rights has become highly centralized. As Garry argues, individual rights have been placed exclusively under judicial jurisdiction not because of anything the Constitution commands, but because of the constitutional compromise of the New Deal.During the Rehnquist era, the Court tried to reinvigorate the constitutional doctrine of federalism by strengthening certain powers of the states. But, according to Garry, this effort only went halfway toward a true revival of federalism, since the Court continued to rely on judicially enforced individual rights for the protection of liberty. A more comprehensive reform would require a return to the earlier reliance on both federalism and separation of powers as structural devices for protecting liberty. Such reform, as Garry notes, would also help revitalize the role of legislatures in our democratic system.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021)
650 0 _aConstitutional history
_zUnited States.
650 0 _aConstitutional law
_zUnited States.
650 0 _aNew Deal, 1933-1939.
650 7 _aLAW / Constitutional.
_2bisacsh
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780271035000?locatt=mode:legacy
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780271035000
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780271035000.jpg
942 _cEB
999 _c187071
_d187071