| 000 | 04480nam a22005175i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 187071 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214232309.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 210830t20212008pau fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9780271035000 _qPDF | ||
| 024 | 7 | _a10.1515/9780271035000 _2doi | |
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9780271035000 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)583659 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1253313772 | ||
| 040 | _aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda | ||
| 050 | 4 | _aKF4541 _b.G37 2008eb | |
| 072 | 7 | _aLAW018000 _2bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a342.7302/9 _222 | 
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 | _aGarry, Patrick M. _eautore | |
| 245 | 1 | 3 | _aAn Entrenched Legacy : _bHow the New Deal Constitutional Revolution Continues to Shape the Role of the Supreme Court / _cPatrick M. Garry. | 
| 264 | 1 | _aUniversity Park, PA : _bPenn State University Press, _c[2021] | |
| 264 | 4 | _c©2008 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (200 p.) | ||
| 336 | _atext _btxt _2rdacontent | ||
| 337 | _acomputer _bc _2rdamedia | ||
| 338 | _aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | _atext file _bPDF _2rda | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 | _tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tIntroduction -- _t1 The New Deal Constitutional Revolution -- _t2 At the Heart of the Revolution: The Constitution's Structural Provisions -- _t3 How the Administrative State Has Boosted Judicial Power -- _t4 The Court's Federalism Revolution -- _t5 A One-Sided Federalism Revolution: Ignoring the Liberty Side of Federalism -- _t6 Contradicting the Federalism Revolution: The Court's Nationalizing Rights-Jurisprudence -- _tConclusion: A Stifling of the Democratic Process -- _tIndex | 
| 506 | 0 | _arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star | |
| 520 | _aAn Entrenched Legacy takes a fresh look at the role of the Supreme Court in our modern constitutional system. Although criticisms of judicial power today often attribute its rise to the activism of justices seeking to advance particular political ideologies, Patrick Garry argues instead that the Supreme Court's power has grown mainly because of certain constitutional decisions during the New Deal era that initially seemed to portend a lessening of the Court's power. When the Court retreated from enforcing separation of powers and federalism as the twin structural protections for individual liberty in the face of FDR's New Deal agenda, it was inevitably drawn into an alternative approach, substantive due process, as a means for protecting individual rights. This has led to many controversial judicial rulings, particularly regarding the recognition and enforcement of privacy rights. It has also led to the mistaken belief that the judiciary serves as the only protection of liberty and that an inherent conflict exists between individual liberty and majoritarian rule. Moreover, because the Court has assumed sole responsibility for preserving liberty, the whole area of individual rights has become highly centralized. As Garry argues, individual rights have been placed exclusively under judicial jurisdiction not because of anything the Constitution commands, but because of the constitutional compromise of the New Deal.During the Rehnquist era, the Court tried to reinvigorate the constitutional doctrine of federalism by strengthening certain powers of the states. But, according to Garry, this effort only went halfway toward a true revival of federalism, since the Court continued to rely on judicially enforced individual rights for the protection of liberty. A more comprehensive reform would require a return to the earlier reliance on both federalism and separation of powers as structural devices for protecting liberty. Such reform, as Garry notes, would also help revitalize the role of legislatures in our democratic system. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aConstitutional history _zUnited States. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aConstitutional law _zUnited States. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aNew Deal, 1933-1939. | |
| 650 | 7 | _aLAW / Constitutional. _2bisacsh | |
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780271035000?locatt=mode:legacy | 
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780271035000 | 
| 856 | 4 | 2 | _3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780271035000.jpg | 
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 | _c187071 _d187071 | ||