000			03117nam a22004815i 4500
001			187270
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214232317.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			220524t20212015pau fo d z eng d
020			_a9780271070452 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.1515/9780271070452 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780271070452
035			_a(DE-B1597)584001
035			_a(OCoLC)1253313625
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
072		7	_aPHI026000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a194 _223
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aPagani, Karen _eautore
245	1	0	_aMan or Citizen : _bAnger, Forgiveness, and Authenticity in Rousseau / _cKaren Pagani.
264		1	_aUniversity Park, PA : _bPenn State University Press, _c[2021]
264		4	_c©2015
300			_a1 online resource (256 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aThe French studies scholar Patrick Coleman made the important observation that over the course of the eighteenth century, the social meanings of anger became increasingly democratized. The work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau is an outstanding example of this change. In Man or Citizen, Karen Pagani expands, in original and fascinating ways, the study of anger in Rousseau's autobiographical, literary, and philosophical works. Pagani is especially interested in how and to what degree anger-and various reconciliatory responses to anger, such as forgiveness-functions as a defining aspect of one's identity, both as a private individual and as a public citizen. Rousseau himself was, as Pagani puts it, "unabashed" in his own anger and indignation-toward society on one hand (corrupter of our naturally good and authentic selves) and, on the other, toward certain individuals who had somehow wronged him (his famous philosophical disputes with Voltaire and Diderot, for example). In Rousseau's work, Pagani finds that the extent to which an individual processes, expresses, and eventually resolves or satisfies anger is very much of moral and political concern. She argues that for Rousseau, anger is not only inevitable but also indispensable, and that the incapacity to experience it renders one amoral, while the ability to experience it is a key element of good citizenship.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Mai 2022)
650		0	_aAnger _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aForgiveness _xPhilosophy.
650		7	_aPHILOSOPHY / Criticism. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780271070452?locatt=mode:legacy
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780271070452
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780271070452/original
942			_cEB
999			_c187270 _d187270