000			03655nam a22005535i 4500
001			187348
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214232319.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			210621t20211990pau fo d z eng d
020			_a9780271073316 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.1515/9780271073316 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780271073316
035			_a(DE-B1597)584082
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aPR3664.C43 _bB44 1990
072		7	_aLIT012000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a823/.6 _220
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aBeebee, Thomas O. _eautore
245	1	0	_aClarissa on the Continent : _bTranslation and Seduction / _cThomas O. Beebee.
264		1	_aUniversity Park, PA : _bPenn State University Press, _c[2021]
264		4	_c©1990
300			_a1 online resource (244 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tPreface -- _t1 Introduction: Richardson, Prevost, Michaelis -- _t2 Translation, Transposition, Intertextuality -- _t3 Texts in Opposition -- _t4 Translating Dialogism -- _t5 Clarissa's Blooming; or, Translation and Textual Life -- _tBibliography -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_a";Clarissa"; on the Continent defines and explores two strategies of literary translation-creative vs. preservative and strong vs. weak-as they transform one of the most influential English novels. Thomas Beebee compares the two opposing strategies as they influence the French translation of Clarissa by the novelist Antione François de Prévost and the German translation by the Göttingen Orientalist Johann David Michaelis, and in doing so he demonstrates that each translator found authority for his procedure within the text itself. Each translation is also examined in light of Richardson's other writings and placed in its literary and cultural context. This study uses translations in order to interpret Clarissa, to show how the basis for the novel's reception on the Continent was laid, and to explore the differences and interactions among three literary and cultural systems of the eighteenth century. The close examination of these two important translations enable the formulation of not only a theory of creative vs. preservative translation but also the interconnections between literary theory and translation theory. Beebee also looks at later translations of Clarissa as products of literary and historical change and at Prévostian strategies of the novel.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 21. Jun 2021)
650		0	_aEnglish fiction _xAppreciation _zEurope.
650		0	_aEpistolary fiction, English _xHistory and criticism.
650		0	_aRape victims in literature.
650		0	_aSeduction in literature.
650		0	_aTranslating and interpreting _xHistory _y18th century.
650		0	_aTranslating and interpreting _xHistory _y19th century.
650		0	_aWomen and literature _xHistory _y18th century.
650		7	_aLITERARY CRITICISM / Reference. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780271073316?locatt=mode:legacy
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780271073316
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780271073316.jpg
942			_cEB
999			_c187348 _d187348