000 03577nam a22004575i 4500
001 188585
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214232407.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 220524t20211971txu fo d z eng d
020 _a9780292780088
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.7560/700918
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9780292780088
035 _a(DE-B1597)588258
035 _a(OCoLC)1286807416
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
072 7 _aPER011020
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a792
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aHughes, Leo
_eautore
245 1 4 _aThe Drama's Patrons :
_bA Study of the Eighteenth-Century London Audience /
_cLeo Hughes.
264 1 _aAustin :
_bUniversity of Texas Press,
_c[2021]
264 4 _c©1971
300 _a1 online resource
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aThe drama's laws, the drama's patrons give, For we that live to please, must please to live. —Samuel Johnson, 1747 Democratic ferment, responsible for political explosions in the seventeenth century and expanded power in the eighteenth, affected all phases of English life. The theatre reflected these forces in the content of the plays of the period and in an increased awareness among playgoers that the theatre "must please to live." Drawing from a wealth of amusing and informative contemporary accounts, Leo Hughes presents abundant evidence that the theatre-going public proved zealous, and sometimes even unruly, in asserting its role and rights. He describes numerous species of individual pest-the box-lobby saunterers, the vizard masks (ladies of uncertain virtue), the catcallers, and the weeping sentimentalists. Protest demonstrations of various interest groups, such as footmen asserting their rights to sit in the upper gallery, reflect the behavior of the audience as a whole-an audience that Alexander Pope described as "the manyheaded monster of the pit." Hughes analyzes the changes in the audience's taste through the long span from Dryden's day to Sheridan's. He illustrates the decline in taste from the sophisticated, if bawdy, comedy of the Restoration Period to the sentimentalism and empty show of later decades. He attributes the increased emphasis on sentiment and spectacle to audience influence and describes the effects of audience demands on managers, playwrights, and players. He describes in detail the mixed assembly that frequented the theatre during this period and the greatly enlarged theatres that were built to accommodate it. Hughes concludes that it was the English people's basic love of liberty that allowed them to accept audience disruptions considered intolerable by foreign visitors and that the drama's patrons greatly influenced the quality of theatrical production during this long period.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Mai 2022)
650 7 _aPERFORMING ARTS / Theater / History & Criticism.
_2bisacsh
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.7560/700918
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780292780088
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780292780088/original
942 _cEB
999 _c188585
_d188585