| 000 | 03446nam a22004815i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 189615 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214232447.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 210830t20212004mau fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9780674038189 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.4159/9780674038189 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9780674038189 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)574360 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1243311233 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 | _aBR516 -- H19 2002eb | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW018000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a322.10973 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aHamburger, Philip _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSeparation of Church and State / _cPhilip Hamburger. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCambridge, MA : _bHarvard University Press, _c[2021] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2004 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (528 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tCONTENTS -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIntroduction -- _tI LATE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY RELIGIOUS LIBERTY -- _tII EARLY NINETEENTH-CENTURY REPUBLICANISM -- _tIII MID-NINETEENTH-CENTURY AMERICANISM -- _tIV LATE NINETEENTH- AND TWENTIETH-CENTURY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -- _tConclusion -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aIn a powerful challenge to conventional wisdom, Philip Hamburger argues that the separation of church and state has no historical foundation in the First Amendment. The detailed evidence assembled here shows that eighteenth-century Americans almost never invoked this principle. Although Thomas Jefferson and others retrospectively claimed that the First Amendment separated church and state, separation became part of American constitutional law only much later. Hamburger shows that separation became a constitutional freedom largely through fear and prejudice. Jefferson supported separation out of hostility to the Federalist clergy of New England. Nativist Protestants (ranging from nineteenth-century Know Nothings to twentieth-century members of the K.K.K.) adopted the principle of separation to restrict the role of Catholics in public life. Gradually, these Protestants were joined by theologically liberal, anti-Christian secularists, who hoped that separation would limit Christianity and all other distinct religions. Eventually, a wide range of men and women called for separation. Almost all of these Americans feared ecclesiastical authority, particularly that of the Catholic Church, and, in response to their fears, they increasingly perceived religious liberty to require a separation of church from state. American religious liberty was thus redefined and even transformed. In the process, the First Amendment was often used as an instrument of intolerance and discrimination. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021) | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aLAW / Constitutional. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038189 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674038189 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780674038189.jpg |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c189615 _d189615 |
||