| 000 | 03164nam a22006375i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 190052 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214232504.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 190708s2009 mau fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9780674032668 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9780674054158 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.4159/9780674054158 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9780674054158 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)457684 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)651657410 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)979742736 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 | _aLB2333 -- L36 2009eb | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aEDU015000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a378.1/2 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aLamont, Michèle _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aHow Professors Think : _bInside the Curious World of Academic Judgment / _cMichèle Lamont. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCambridge, MA : _bHarvard University Press, _c[2009] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2009 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _t1 / Opening the Black Box of Peer Review -- _t2 / How Panels Work -- _t3 / On Disciplinary Cultures -- _t4 / Pragmatic Fairness: Customary Rules of Deliberation -- _t5 / Recognizing Various Kinds of Excellence -- _t6 /Considering Interdisciplinarity and Diversity -- _t7 /Implications in the United States and Abroad -- _tAppendix: Methods and Data Analysis -- _tNotes -- _tReferences -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aEveryone in academia stresses quality. But what exactly is it, and how do professors identify it? Michèle Lamont observed deliberations for fellowships and research grants, and interviewed panel members at length. In How Professors Think, she reveals what she discovered about this secretive, powerful, peculiar world. Lamont aims to illuminate the confidential process of evaluation and to push the gatekeepers to both better understand and perform their role. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 08. Jul 2019) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aCollege teachers _vRating of. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCollege teachers _xRating of. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aEducation, Higher. | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aEnseignants _vEfficacité |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aHochschullehrer _vEvaluation. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aManuskript _vWissenschaftliche Zeitschrift _vEvaluation. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aPeer review. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aPortfolios in education. | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aProfesseurs (Enseignement supérieur) _vÉvaluation. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aTeacher effectiveness. | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aWissenschaftliche Zeitschrift _vManuskript _vEvaluation. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aEDUCATION / Higher. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054158 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780674054158.jpg |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c190052 _d190052 |
||