000			03427nam a22004935i 4500
001			190935
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214232539.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			220524t20212013mau fo d z eng d
020			_a9780674257931 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.4159/9780674257931 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780674257931
035			_a(DE-B1597)589285
035			_a(OCoLC)1257324421
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
072		7	_aLCO010000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a111/.85 _223
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aSpivak, Gayatri Chakravorty _eautore
245	1	3	_aAn Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization / _cGayatri Chakravorty Spivak.
264		1	_aCambridge, MA : _bHarvard University Press, _c[2021]
264		4	_c©2013
300			_a1 online resource (624 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aDuring the past twenty years, the world's most renowned critical theorist-the scholar who defined the field of postcolonial studies-has experienced a radical reorientation in her thinking. Finding the neat polarities of tradition and modernity, colonial and postcolonial, no longer sufficient for interpreting the globalized present, she turns elsewhere to make her central argument: that aesthetic education is the last available instrument for implementing global justice and democracy. Spivak's unwillingness to sacrifice the ethical in the name of the aesthetic, or to sacrifice the aesthetic in grappling with the political, makes her task formidable. As she wrestles with these fraught relationships, she rewrites Friedrich Schiller's concept of play as double bind, reading Gregory Bateson with Gramsci as she negotiates Immanuel Kant, while in dialogue with her teacher Paul de Man. Among the concerns Spivak addresses is this: Are we ready to forfeit the wealth of the world's languages in the name of global communication? "Even a good globalization (the failed dream of socialism) requires the uniformity which the diversity of mother-tongues must challenge," Spivak writes. "The tower of Babel is our refuge." In essays on theory, translation, Marxism, gender, and world literature, and on writers such as Assia Djebar, J. M. Coetzee, and Rabindranath Tagore, Spivak argues for the social urgency of the humanities and renews the case for literary studies, imprisoned in the corporate university. "Perhaps," she writes, "the literary can still do something."
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Mai 2022)
650		0	_aAesthetics _xStudy and teaching _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aCulture and globalization _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aLiterature _xStudy and teaching _xPhilosophy.
650		7	_aLITERARY COLLECTIONS / Essays. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.4159/9780674257931?locatt=mode:legacy
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674257931
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780674257931/original
942			_cEB
999			_c190935 _d190935