| 000 | 03028nam a22004815i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 191085 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20250106150323.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 241019t19981998mau fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9780674273757 _qPDF | ||
| 024 | 7 | _a10.4159/9780674273757 _2doi | |
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9780674273757 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)617419 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1294423224 | ||
| 040 | _aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda | ||
| 072 | 7 | _aLIT006000 _2bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a801/.95/092 _221 | 
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 | _aGasché, Rodolphe _eautore | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | _aThe Wild Card of Reading : _bOn Paul de Man / _cRodolphe Gasché. | 
| 264 | 1 | _aCambridge, MA : _bHarvard University Press, _c[1998] | |
| 264 | 4 | _c1998 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (610 p.) | ||
| 336 | _atext _btxt _2rdacontent | ||
| 337 | _acomputer _bc _2rdamedia | ||
| 338 | _aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | _atext file _bPDF _2rda | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 | _tFrontmatter -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tContents -- _tAbbreviations -- _tIntroduction -- _t1 “Setzung” and “Übersetzung” -- _t2 In-Difference to Philosophy -- _t3 Apathetic Formalism -- _t4 The Fallout of Reading -- _t5 Giving to Read -- _t6 Adding Oddities -- _tAppendix: On the Edges -- _tNotes -- _tIndex | 
| 506 | 0 | _arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star | |
| 520 | _aOne of the most knowledgeable and provocative explicators of Paul de Man's writings, Rodolphe Gasché, a philosopher by training, demonstrates for the first time the systematic coherence of the critic's work, insisting that de Man continues to merit close attention despite his notoriously difficult and obscure style. Gasché shows that de Man's "reading" centers on a dimension of the texts that is irreducible to any possible meaning, a dimension characterized by the "absolutely singular."Given that de Man and Derrida are both termed deconstructionists, Gasché differentiates between the two by emphasizing Derrida's primary interest in "writing," and postulates that the best way to come to terms with de Man's works is to "read" them athwart the writings of Kant, Fichte, Hegel, Heidegger, and Derrida. He shows his respect for the "immanent logic" of de Man's thought--which he lays out in great detail--while revealing his uneasiness at the oddness of that thought and its consequences. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 19. Oct 2024) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aCriticism _xHistory _y20th century. | |
| 650 | 7 | _aLITERARY CRITICISM / Semiotics & Theory. _2bisacsh | |
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.4159/9780674273757?locatt=mode:legacy | 
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674273757 | 
| 856 | 4 | 2 | _3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780674273757/original | 
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 | _c191085 _d191085 | ||