| 000 | 03463nam a22005175i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 191863 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214232616.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 210830t20142014mau fo d z eng d | ||
| 019 | _a(OCoLC)905303745 | ||
| 020 |
_a9780674726840 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9780674416222 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.4159/harvard.9780674416222 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9780674416222 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)427241 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)881183784 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 | _aBJ1031 | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aPOL010000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a170/.42 _223 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aSandel, Adam Adatto _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe Place of Prejudice : _bA Case for Reasoning within the World / _cAdam Adatto Sandel. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCambridge, MA : _bHarvard University Press, _c[2014] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2014 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (278 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tIntroduction -- _t1. The Case against Prejudice -- _t2. The Case for Situated Understanding Heidegger on Being- in- the- World -- _t3. Situated Agency -- _t4. The Role of Prejudice in the Study of History -- _t5. The Role of Prejudice in Moral Judgment -- _t6. Prejudice and Rhetoric -- _tBibliography -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aToday we associate prejudice with ignorance and bigotry and consider it a source of injustice. So how can prejudice have a legitimate place in moral and political judgment? In this ambitious work, Adam Sandel shows that prejudice, properly understood, is not an unfortunate obstacle to clear thinking but an essential aspect of it. The aspiration to reason without preconceptions, he argues, is misguided. Ranging across philosophy from Aristotle to Heidegger and Gadamer, Sandel demonstrates that we inherit our "prejudice against prejudice" from the Enlightenment. By detaching reason from habit and common opinion, thinkers such as Bacon, Descartes, and Kant invented prejudice--as we understand it today--as an obstacle to freedom and a failure to think for oneself. The Place of Prejudice presents a powerful challenge to this picture. The attempt to purge understanding of culture and history leads not to truth, Sandel warns, but to shallowness and confusion. A purely detached notion of reason deprives judgment of all perspective, disparages political rhetoric as mere pandering, and denies us the background knowledge we need to interpret literature, law, and the past. In a clear, eloquent voice, Sandel presents instead a compelling case for reasoning within the world. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021) | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674416222 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674416222 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780674416222.jpg |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c191863 _d191863 |
||