000			03656nam a22006135i 4500
001			193700
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214232728.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			221201t20162016mau fo d z eng d
020			_a9780674969926 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.4159/9780674969926 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780674969926
035			_a(DE-B1597)466619
035			_a(OCoLC)984688315
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aK1420
072		7	_aLAW060000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a346.4204/82
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aRose, Mark _eautore
245	1	0	_aAuthors in Court : _bScenes from the Theater of Copyright / _cMark Rose.
264		1	_aCambridge, MA : _bHarvard University Press, _c[2016]
264		4	_c©2016
300			_a1 online resource (212 p.) : _b20 halftones
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tPreface -- _t1. Defoe in the Pillory -- _t2. Genteel Wrath -- _t3. Emancipation and Translation -- _t4. Creating Oscar Wilde -- _t5. Hollywood Story -- _t6. Prohibited Paraphrase -- _t7. Purloined Puppies -- _t8. Afterword: Metamorphoses of Authorship -- _tNotes -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aThrough a series of vivid case studies, Authors in Court charts the 300-year-long dance between authorship and copyright that has shaped each institution’s response to changing social norms of identity, privacy, and celebrity. “A literary historian by training, Rose is completely at home in the world of law, as well as the history of photography and art. This is the work of an interdisciplinary scholar at the height of his powers. The arguments are sophisticated and the elegant text is a work of real craftsmanship. It is superb.” —Lionel Bently, University of Cambridge “Authors in Court is well-written, erudite, informative, and engaging throughout. As the chapters go along, we see the way that personalities inflect the supposedly impartial law; we see the role of gender in authorial self-fashioning; we see some of the fault lines which produce litigation; and we get a nice history of the evolution of the fair use doctrine. This is a book that should at least be on reserve for any IP–related course. Going forward, no one writing about any of the cases Rose discusses can afford to ignore his contribution.” —Lewis Hyde, Kenyon College
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022)
650		0	_aAuthorship _xHistory.
650		0	_aCopyright _zEngland _vCases.
650		0	_aCopyright _zEngland _xHistory.
650		0	_aCopyright _zUnited States _vCases.
650		0	_aCopyright _zUnited States _xHistory.
650		7	_aLAW / Legal History. _2bisacsh
700	1		_aCurll, Pope v _eautore
700	1		_aHouse, Salinger v. Random _eautore
700	1		_aKoons, Rogers v _eautore
700	1		_aSarony, Burrow- Giles v _eautore
700	1		_aThomas, Stowe v _eautore
700	1		_aUniversal, Nichols v _eautore
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.4159/9780674969926
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674969926
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780674969926/original
942			_cEB
999			_c193700 _d193700