| 000 | 02921nam a22005055i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 193713 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214232728.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 221201t20162016mau fo d z eng d | ||
| 019 | _a(OCoLC)984676692 | ||
| 020 |
_a9780674970311 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.4159/9780674970311 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9780674970311 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)466647 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)945554290 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aPR2819 _b.V53 2016 |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLIT015000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a822.3/3 _223 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aVickers, Brian _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe One ‹i›King Lear‹/i› / _cBrian Vickers. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCambridge, MA : _bHarvard University Press, _c[2016] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2016 | |
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (416 p.) : _b7 halftones, 1 line illustration, 2 tables |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tPreface -- _tA Note on References -- _tPart 1. The Quarto, 1608 -- _tChapter 1. King Lear at the Printer -- _tChapter 2. Adjusting Text Space to Print Space in the Shakespeare Folio and Quartos -- _tChapter 3. Nicholas Okes Compresses the Play -- _tChapter 4. Nicholas Okes Abridges It -- _tPart 2. The Folio, 1623 -- _tChapter 5. One Play, One Manuscript, Two Printed Books -- _tChapter 6. The Folio Editors Regularize Shakespeare -- _tChapter 7. The King’s Men Abridge a Tragedy -- _tPart 3. The One King Lear -- _tChapter 8. The “Two Versions” Revisited -- _tConclusion: Toward a New Consensus -- _tAppendix 1. Illustrations and Commentary -- _tAppendix 2. Space Saving in Q1 King Lear -- _tNotes -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aIn the 1980s influential scholars argued that Shakespeare revised King Lear in light of theatrical performance, resulting in two texts by the bard’s own hand. The two-text theory hardened into orthodoxy. Here Sir Brian Vickers makes the case that Shakespeare did not cut his original text. At stake is the way his greatest play is read and performed. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aTransmission of texts _zEngland _xHistory _y17th century. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aLITERARY CRITICISM / Shakespeare. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.4159/9780674970311 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674970311 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780674970311/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c193713 _d193713 |
||