000			04034nam a22005295i 4500
001			193787
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214232731.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			210824t20172016mau fo d z eng d
020			_a9780674974708 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.4159/9780674974708 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780674974708
035			_a(DE-B1597)479804
035			_a(OCoLC)984687852
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aKF4772 _b.W456 2016
072		7	_aLAW060000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a342.7308/53 _223
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aWeinrib, Laura _eautore
245	1	4	_aThe Taming of Free Speech : _bAmerica’s Civil Liberties Compromise / _cLaura Weinrib.
264		1	_aCambridge, MA : _bHarvard University Press, _c[2017]
264		4	_c©2016
300			_a1 online resource (412 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tIntroduction -- _t1. Freedom of Speech in Class War Time -- _t2. The Citadel of Civil Liberty -- _t3. The Right of Agitation -- _t4. Dissent -- _t5. The New Battleground -- _t6. Old Left, New Rights -- _t7. The Civil Liberties Consensus -- _t8. Free Speech or Fair Labor -- _tEpilogue -- _tAbbreviations -- _tNotes -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aIn the early decades of the twentieth century, business leaders condemned civil liberties as masks for subversive activity, while labor sympathizers denounced the courts as shills for industrial interests. But by the Second World War, prominent figures in both camps celebrated the judiciary for protecting freedom of speech. In this strikingly original history, Laura Weinrib illustrates how a surprising coalition of lawyers and activists made judicial enforcement of the Bill of Rights a defining feature of American democracy. The Taming of Free Speech traces our understanding of civil liberties to conflict between 1910 and 1940 over workers’ right to strike. As self-proclaimed partisans in the class war, the founders of the American Civil Liberties Union promoted a bold vision of free speech that encompassed unrestricted picketing and boycotts. Over time, however, they subdued their rhetoric to attract adherents and prevail in court. At the height of the New Deal, many liberals opposed the ACLU’s litigation strategy, fearing it would legitimize a judiciary they deemed too friendly to corporations and too hostile to the administrative state. Conversely, conservatives eager to insulate industry from government regulation pivoted to embrace civil liberties, despite their radical roots. The resulting transformation in constitutional jurisprudence—often understood as a triumph for the Left—was in fact a calculated bargain. America’s civil liberties compromise saved the courts from New Deal attack and secured free speech for labor radicals and businesses alike. Ever since, competing groups have clashed in the arena of ideas, shielded by the First Amendment.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Aug 2021)
650		0	_aCivil rights _zUnited States _xHistory _y20th century.
650		0	_aEmployee rights _zUnited States _xHistory _y20th century.
650		0	_aFreedom of speech _zUnited States _xHistory _y20th century.
650		0	_aLabor movement _zUnited States _xHistory _y20th century.
650		7	_aLAW / Legal History. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.4159/9780674974708
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674974708
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780674974708.jpg
942			_cEB
999			_c193787 _d193787