| 000 | 04869nam a22005895i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 194610 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214232804.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 210621t20192020nju fo d z eng d | ||
| 010 | _a2019024587 | ||
| 020 | _a9780691147161 _qprint | ||
| 020 | _a9780691197500 _qPDF | ||
| 024 | 7 | _a10.1515/9780691197500 _2doi | |
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9780691197500 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)535151 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1122450246 | ||
| 040 | _aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | _aB105.J87 | 
| 050 | 4 | _aB105.J87 _bE77 2020 | |
| 072 | 7 | _aPHI019000 _2bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a320.01/1 _223 | 
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 | _aEstlund, David _eautore | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aUtopophobia : _bOn the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy / _cDavid Estlund. | 
| 264 | 1 | _aPrinceton, NJ : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2019] | |
| 264 | 4 | _c©2020 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (400 p.) : _b2 tables | ||
| 336 | _atext _btxt _2rdacontent | ||
| 337 | _acomputer _bc _2rdamedia | ||
| 338 | _aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | _atext file _bPDF _2rda | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 | _tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tPreface and Acknowledgments -- _tPART I. LOOKING UP TO JUSTICE -- _tChapter 1. An Unrealistic Introduction -- _tChapter 2. Overview -- _tChapter 3. Anti-Anti- Moralism -- _tChapter 4. Circumstances and Justice -- _tPART II. UNBENDING JUSTICE -- _tChapter 5. Utopophobia -- _tChapter 6. Mitigating Motives -- _tChapter 7. Justice Unbent -- _tPART III. BEYOND CONCESSIVE JUSTICE -- _tChapter 8. Concessive Requirement -- _tChapter 9. Bad Facts -- _tChapter 10. Prime Justice -- _tPART IV. THE CULPRIT PROBLEM -- _tChapter 11. The Puzzle of Plural Obligation -- _tChapter 12. Plural Requirement -- _tPART V. THE PRACTICAL AND THE IDEALISTIC -- _tChapter 13. Progress, Perfection, and Practice -- _tChapter 14. The Fallacy of Approximation -- _tChapter 15. Countervailing Deviation -- _tChapter 16. Beyond Practicalism -- _tChapter 17. Informed Concern -- _tEpilogue -- _tNotes -- _tIndex of Examples and Propositions -- _tGeneral Index -- _tA note on the type | 
| 506 | 0 | _arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star | |
| 520 | _aA leading political theorist's groundbreaking defense of ideal conceptions of justice in political philosophyThroughout the history of political philosophy and politics, there has been continual debate about the roles of idealism versus realism. For contemporary political philosophy, this debate manifests in notions of ideal theory versus nonideal theory. Nonideal thinkers shift their focus from theorizing about full social justice, asking instead which feasible institutional and political changes would make a society more just. Ideal thinkers, on the other hand, question whether full justice is a standard that any society is likely ever to satisfy. And, if social justice is unrealistic, are attempts to understand it without value or importance, and merely utopian?Utopophobia argues against thinking that justice must be realistic, or that understanding justice is only valuable if it can be realized. David Estlund does not offer a particular theory of justice, nor does he assert that justice is indeed unrealizable-only that it could be, and this possibility upsets common ways of proceeding in political thought. Estlund engages critically with important strands in traditional and contemporary political philosophy that assume a sound theory of justice has the overriding, defining task of contributing practical guidance toward greater social justice. Along the way, he counters several tempting perspectives, including the view that inquiry in political philosophy could have significant value only as a guide to practical political action, and that understanding true justice would necessarily have practical value, at least as an ideal arrangement to be approximated.Demonstrating that unrealistic standards of justice can be both sound and valuable to understand, Utopophobia stands as a trenchant defense of ideal theory in political philosophy. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 21. Jun 2021) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aIdealism. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aJustice (Philosophy) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aJustice (Philosophy). | |
| 650 | 0 | _aPolitical science _xPhilosophy. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aRealism. | |
| 650 | 7 | _aPHILOSOPHY / Political. _2bisacsh | |
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780691197500?locatt=mode:legacy | 
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780691197500 | 
| 856 | 4 | 2 | _3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780691197500.jpg | 
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 | _c194610 _d194610 | ||