| 000 | 05904nam a22011175i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 195572 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214232848.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 220729t20221997nju fo d z eng d | ||
| 010 | _a2020759453 | ||
| 020 |
_a9780691227511 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9780691227511 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9780691227511 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)576690 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | _aE183.8.G3 |
| 050 | 4 |
_aE183.8.G3 _b.F376 1997 |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHIS036060 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a940.532273 _223 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aFarnham, Barbara Reardon _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aRoosevelt and the Munich Crisis : _bA Study of Political Decision-Making / _cBarbara Reardon Farnham. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aPrinceton, NJ : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2022] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©1997 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (328 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aPrinceton Studies in International History and Politics ; _v190 |
|
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tPreface -- _tAbbreviations Used in the Footnotes -- _tChapter I Roosevelt, the Munich Crisis, and Political Decision-Making -- _tPart One THEORY -- _tChapter II The Political Approach to Decision-Making -- _tPART TWO: ROOSEVELT AND THE MUNICH CRISIS -- _tChapter III The "Watershed" between Two Wars: 1936-1938 -- _tChapter IV The Munich Crisis -- _tChapter V Assessing the Munich Crisis -- _tChapter VI Dealing with the Consequences of Munich -- _tChapter VII Implications for History and Theory -- _tAppendix A Traditional Approaches to Decision-Making -- _tAppendix B Analyzing the Calculus of Political Feasibility: The Nature of the Acceptability Constraint -- _tAppendix C The Traditional Political Strategies -- _tBibliography -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aFranklin Roosevelt's intentions during the three years between Munich and Pearl Harbor have been a source of controversy among historians for decades. Barbara Farnham offers both a theory of how the domestic political context affects foreign policy decisions in general and a fresh interpretation of FDR's post-Munich policies based on the insights that the theory provides. Between 1936 and 1938, Roosevelt searched for ways to influence the deteriorating international situation. When Hitler's behavior during the Munich crisis showed him to be incorrigibly aggressive, FDR settled on aiding the democracies, a course to which he adhered until America's entry into the war. This policy attracted him because it allowed him to deal with a serious problem: the conflict between the need to stop Hitler and the domestic imperative to avoid any risk of American involvement in a war. Because existing theoretical approaches to value conflict ignore the influence of political factors on decision-making, they offer little help in explaining Roosevelt's behavior. As an alternative, this book develops a political approach to decision-making which focuses on the impact that awareness of the imperatives of the political context can have on decision-making processes and, through them, policy outcomes. It suggests that in the face of a clash of central values decision-makers who are aware of the demands of the political context are likely to be reluctant to make trade-offs, seeking instead a solution that gives some measure of satisfaction to all the values implicated in the decision. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jul 2022) | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aHISTORY / United States / 20th Century. _2bisacsh |
|
| 653 | _aAcceptability. | ||
| 653 | _aAid to democracies. | ||
| 653 | _aAirpower. | ||
| 653 | _aAppeasement. | ||
| 653 | _aAuthoritarian government. | ||
| 653 | _aBehavioral Decision Theory. | ||
| 653 | _aBelief systems. | ||
| 653 | _aBerchtesgaden. | ||
| 653 | _aBlockade. | ||
| 653 | _aBolstering. | ||
| 653 | _aBuck-passing. | ||
| 653 | _aBureaucratic politics. | ||
| 653 | _aCase studies. | ||
| 653 | _aCharlottesville Program. | ||
| 653 | _aCognitive effort. | ||
| 653 | _aCompromise. | ||
| 653 | _aConsensus. | ||
| 653 | _aConsistency. | ||
| 653 | _aCzechoslovakia. | ||
| 653 | _aDecision rules. | ||
| 653 | _aDemocratic peace. | ||
| 653 | _aDiesing, Paul. | ||
| 653 | _aDror, Yehezkel. | ||
| 653 | _aEmerson, William. | ||
| 653 | _aEurope. | ||
| 653 | _aFrance. | ||
| 653 | _aGeorge, Alexander. | ||
| 653 | _aGodesberg meeting. | ||
| 653 | _aGood Neighbor Policy. | ||
| 653 | _aHaglund, David. | ||
| 653 | _aHelium controversy. | ||
| 653 | _aHull, Cordell. | ||
| 653 | _aHyde Park meetings. | ||
| 653 | _aIncrementalism. | ||
| 653 | _aInterventionists. | ||
| 653 | _aIsolationism. | ||
| 653 | _aJouaux, Leon. | ||
| 653 | _aKeynes, John Maynard. | ||
| 653 | _aLevels of analysis. | ||
| 653 | _aLindsay, Sir Ronald. | ||
| 653 | _aLothian, Lord. | ||
| 653 | _aNine Power Conference. | ||
| 653 | _aOpportunity costs. | ||
| 653 | _aOptimizing. | ||
| 653 | _aPlausibility probe. | ||
| 653 | _aPolicy analysts. | ||
| 653 | _aRainbow Plans. | ||
| 653 | _aRearmament. | ||
| 653 | _aRoosevelt administration. | ||
| 653 | _aSearch-design continuum. | ||
| 653 | _aneutrality. | ||
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780691227511?locatt=mode:legacy |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780691227511 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780691227511/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c195572 _d195572 |
||