000 03546nam a22005775i 4500
001 196640
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214232933.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 220629t20222012stk fo d z eng d
010 _a2012551960
020 _a9780748649624
_qprint
020 _a9780748649648
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9780748649648
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9780748649648
035 _a(DE-B1597)614935
035 _a(OCoLC)1302164378
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 0 0 _aKZ6785
_b.P47 2012
050 4 _aKZ6785
_b.P47 2012
072 7 _aPHI005000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a320
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aPerez, Nahshon
_eautore
245 1 0 _aFreedom from Past Injustices :
_bA Critical Evaluation of Claims for Inter-Generational Reparations /
_cNahshon Perez.
264 1 _aEdinburgh :
_bEdinburgh University Press,
_c[2022]
264 4 _c©2012
300 _a1 online resource (200 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tAnalytical Table of Contents --
_tAcknowledgments --
_tPreface --
_tIntroduction --
_tChapter 1 Laying the Groundwork --
_tChapter 2 Non-identity and Redressing Historical Injustices --
_tChapter 3 Against Redress (1): The Individualistic Perspective --
_tChapter 4 Against Redress (2): Thinking about Collectivities, States, and Nations --
_tChapter 5 Intergenerational Redress and Forward-looking Considerations, and the Remaining Case for Redressing Past Wrongs --
_tConclusion --
_tNotes --
_tIndex
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aShould contemporary citizens provide material redress to right past wrongs?There is a widespread belief that contemporary citizens should take responsibility for rectifying past wrongs. Nahshon Perez challenges this view, questioning attempts to aggregate dead wrongdoers with living people, and examining ideas of intergenerational collective responsibility with great suspicion. He distinguishes sharply between those who are indeed unjustly enriched by past wrongs, and those who are not.Looking at issues such as the distinction between compensation and restitution, counterfactuals and the non-identity problem, Perez concludes that individuals have the right to a clean slate, and that almost all of the pro-intergenerational redress arguments are unconvincing.Key FeaturesUnique in claiming past wrongs should not be rectifiedAnalyses pro-intergenerational material redress argumentsCase studies include court cases from Australia, Northern Cyprus, the United States and Austria
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jun 2022)
650 0 _aIntergenerational relations.
650 0 _aReparations for historical injustices.
650 0 _aRestorative justice.
650 0 _aSocial justice.
650 4 _aPolitics.
650 7 _aPHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy.
_2bisacsh
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780748649648
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780748649648
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780748649648/original
942 _cEB
999 _c196640
_d196640