000			03404nam a22005535i 4500
001			197049
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214232949.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			220302t20222016stk fo d z eng d
020			_a9780748695003 _qprint
020			_a9780748695027 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.1515/9780748695027 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780748695027
035			_a(DE-B1597)614819
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aP99 _b.W57 2016
072		7	_aPHI000000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a302.23 _223
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aWilliams, James _eautore
245	1	2	_aA Process Philosophy of Signs / _cJames Williams.
264		1	_aEdinburgh : _bEdinburgh University Press, _c[2022]
264		4	_c©2016
300			_a1 online resource (208 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tAcknowledgements -- _t1. Introduction: The Process Sign -- _t2. The Independent Life of Signs -- _t3. Biology and the Design of Signs -- _t4. Process Signs and the Process Philosophy of Biology -- _t5. The Sign -- _t6. The Process Sign, Structuralism and Semiology -- _t7. The Process Sign After Deleuze and Whitehead -- _t8. The Process Sign is Political -- _t9. Conclusion -- _tNotes -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aA new process philosophy of signs, where process becomes primary, and fixed relation secondary'Behind Red Doors - Signs, Process and the Political' - a post by James Williams on the Edinburgh University Press blogWhat is a sign? We usually think that it is a fixed relation: a red light signifies 'Stop'. In his bold new book, James Williams now argues that signs are varying processes: seeing the red light triggers a creative response to the question, Should I stop?Williams develops this new process philosophy of signs through a formal model, in contrast to earlier structuralist definitions. He draws on the philosophies of Deleuze and Whitehead, criticises earlier work on the sign in biology by Jakob von Uexküll, and connects to contemporary work on process in the philosophy of biology by John Dupré.The process model has wide applications in the arts, humanities and social sciences, and informs their critical debates with science. In defining the sign as essentially political, this radical definition of the sign opens up new possibilities for social and political critique."
530			_aIssued also in print.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)
650		0	_aProcess philosophy.
650		0	_aSemiotics.
650		0	_aSigns and symbols _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aSigns and symbols _xPolitical aspects.
650		4	_aPhilosophy.
650		7	_aPHILOSOPHY / General. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780748695027
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780748695027
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780748695027/original
942			_cEB
999			_c197049 _d197049