000			03972nam a22005775i 4500
001			197363
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214233002.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			220302t20112013nyu fo d z eng d
020			_a9780801445149 _qprint
020			_a9780801460081 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.7591/9780801460081 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780801460081
035			_a(DE-B1597)478699
035			_a(OCoLC)979756016
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
072		7	_aPOL002000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a320.8/50973 _222
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aFrug, Gerald E. _eautore
245	1	0	_aCity Bound : _bHow States Stifle Urban Innovation / _cGerald E. Frug, David J. Barron.
264		1	_aIthaca, NY : _bCornell University Press, _c[2011]
264		4	_c©2013
300			_a1 online resource (280 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tPreface -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tPart I. City Structures -- _t1. City Structures and Urban Theory -- _t2. City Structures and Local Autonomy -- _tPar t II. Seven Cities -- _t3. Home Rule -- _t4. Revenue and Expenditures -- _t5. Land Use and Development -- _t6. Education -- _tPart III. City Futures -- _t7. The Global City -- _t8. The Tourist City -- _t9. The Middle Class City -- _t10. The Regional City -- _tConclusion -- _tNotes -- _tAbout the Authors -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aMany major American cities are defying the conventional wisdom that suburbs are the communities of the future. But as these urban centers prosper, they increasingly confront significant constraints. In City Bound, Gerald E. Frug and David J. Barron address these limits in a new way. Based on a study of the differing legal structures of Boston, New York, Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, San Francisco, and Seattle, City Bound explores how state law determines what cities can and cannot do to raise revenue, control land use, and improve city schools.Frug and Barron show that state law can make it much easier for cities to pursue a global-city or a tourist-city agenda than to respond to the needs of middle-class residents or to pursue regional alliances. But they also explain that state law is often so outdated, and so rooted in an unjustified distrust of local decision making, that the legal process makes it hard for successful cities to develop and implement any coherent vision of their future. Their book calls not for local autonomy but for a new structure of state-local relations that would enable cities to take the lead in charting the future course of urban development. It should be of interest to everyone who cares about the future of American cities, whether political scientists, planners, architects, lawyers, or simply citizens.
530			_aIssued also in print.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)
650		0	_aMunicipal corporations _zUnited States.
650		0	_aMunicipal government _zUnited States.
650		0	_aMunicipal home rule _zUnited States.
650		0	_aState-local relations _zUnited States.
650		4	_aPolitical Science & Political History.
650		4	_aUrban Studies.
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / City Planning & Urban Development. _2bisacsh
700	1		_aBarron, David J. _eautore
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460081
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780801460081
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780801460081/original
942			_cEB
999			_c197363 _d197363