000			04331nam a22006015i 4500
001			197560
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214233010.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			220302t20122012nyu fo d z eng d
019			_a(OCoLC)979622587
020			_a9780801450686 _qprint
020			_a9780801463914 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.7591/9780801463914 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780801463914
035			_a(DE-B1597)478273
035			_a(OCoLC)786129818
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aJV6483 _b.C457 2016
072		7	_aSOC007000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a325.73 _223
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aChebel d'Appollonia, Ariane _eautore
245	1	0	_aFrontiers of Fear : _bImmigration and Insecurity in the United States / _cAriane Chebel d'Appollonia.
264		1	_aIthaca, NY : _bCornell University Press, _c[2012]
264		4	_c©2012
300			_a1 online resource (336 p.) : _b17 tables, 5 charts/graphs
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tList of Figures and Tables -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIntroduction: The Immigration-Security Nexus -- _tPart I. The Framing of Immigration as a Security Issue -- _tIntroduction -- _t1. Newcomers, Old Threats, and Current Concerns -- _t2. Securitization before 9/11 -- _t3. Securitization after 9/11 -- _tPart II. The Dynamics of Policy Failure -- _tIntroduction -- _t4. Border Escalation as a Policy Failure -- _t5. The Security/Insecurity Spiral -- _t6. Radicalization in the West -- _tPart III. Why Do Failed Policies Persist? -- _tIntroduction -- _t7. Emigration, Development, and (In)security -- _t8. Immigration, Economic Interests, and Politics -- _tConclusion: Threats to Western Democracy -- _tList of Abbreviations -- _tNotes -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aOn both sides of the Atlantic, restrictive immigration policies have been framed as security imperatives since the 1990s. This trend accelerated in the aftermath of 9/11 and subsequent terrorist attacks in Europe. In Frontiers of Fear, Ariane Chebel d'Appollonia raises two central questions with profound consequences for national security and immigration policy: First, does the securitization of immigration issues actually contribute to the enhancement of internal security? Second, does the use of counterterrorist measures address such immigration issues as the increasing number of illegal immigrants, the resilience of ethnic tensions, and the emergence of homegrown radicalization?Chebel d'Appollonia questions the main assumptions that inform political agendas in the United States and throughout Europe, analyzing implementation and evaluating the effectiveness of policies in terms of their stated objectives. She argues that the new security-based immigration regime has proven ineffective in achieving its prescribed goals and even aggravated the problems it was supposed to solve: A security/insecurity cycle has been created that results in less security and less democracy. The excesses of securitization have harmed both immigration and counterterrorist policies and seriously damaged the delicate balance between security and respect for civil liberties.
530			_aIssued also in print.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)
650		0	_aBorder security _zEurope.
650		0	_aBorder security _zUnited States.
650		0	_aNational security _zEurope.
650		0	_aNational security _zUnited States.
650		4	_aEurope.
650		4	_aPolitical Science & Political History.
650		4	_aSociology & Social Science.
650		7	_aSOCIAL SCIENCE / Emigration & Immigration. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.7591/9780801463914
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780801463914
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780801463914/original
942			_cEB
999			_c197560 _d197560