000 03924nam a22005175i 4500
001 199653
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214233133.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 221201t20072007nju fo d z eng d
020 _a9780813539836
_qprint
020 _a9780813541280
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.36019/9780813541280
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9780813541280
035 _a(DE-B1597)530109
035 _a(OCoLC)1163878565
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aKJC5138
_b.G65 2009
072 7 _aLAW000000
_2bisacsh
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aGoldhaber, Michael
_eautore
245 1 2 _aA People's History of the European Court of Human Rights :
_bA People's History of the European Court of Human Rights, First Paperback Edition /
_cMichael Goldhaber.
264 1 _aNew Brunswick, NJ :
_bRutgers University Press,
_c[2007]
264 4 _c©2007
300 _a1 online resource (232 p.) :
_b12
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tCONTENTS --
_tACKNOWLEDGMENTS --
_tINTRODUCTION. Europe’s Supreme Court --
_tPART I. The Expanding Ambit of Personal Life --
_tPART II. The Rights of Expression --
_tPART III. State Violence --
_tPART IV. Challenges for the Future --
_tPART V. Concluding Thoughts --
_tSOURCES --
_tINDEX --
_tABOUT THE AUTHOR
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aThe exceptionality of America’s Supreme Court has long been conventional wisdom. But the United States Supreme Court is no longer the only one changing the landscape of public rights and values. Over the past thirty years, the European Court of Human Rights has developed an ambitious, American-style body of law. Unheralded by the mass press, this obscure tribunal in Strasbourg, France has become, in many ways, the Supreme Court of Europe. Michael Goldhaber introduces American audiences to the judicial arm of the Council of Europe—a group distinct from the European Union, and much larger—whose mission is centered on interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights. The Council routinely confronts nations over their most culturally-sensitive, hot-button issues. It has stared down France on the issue of Muslim immigration; Ireland on abortion; Greece on Greek Orthodoxy; Turkey on Kurdish separatism; Austria on Nazism; and Britain on gay rights and corporal punishment. And what is most extraordinary is that nations commonly comply. In the battle for the world’s conscience, Goldhaber shows how the court in Strasbourg may be pulling ahead.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022)
650 0 _aConstitutional law
_zEurope.
650 0 _aEuropean Court of Human Rights
_xHistory.
650 7 _aLAW / General.
_2bisacsh
653 _apolitical science, law, human rights, history, world history, criminology, criminal justice, supreme court, scotus, public rights, european court of human rights, echr, ecthr, international court, european convention on human rights, supreme court of europe, france, europe, court, council of europe, immigration, muslim immigration, abortion, greek orthodoxy, kurdish separatism, nazism, gay rights, corporal punishment, ireland, turkey, austria, britain, legal, judicial, lawyer, european union, human rights protection.
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.36019/9780813541280
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780813541280
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780813541280/original
942 _cEB
999 _c199653
_d199653