000 04117nam a22005775i 4500
001 199870
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214233142.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 210830t20102010nju fo d z eng d
020 _a9780813548029
_qprint
020 _a9780813550299
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.36019/9780813550299
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9780813550299
035 _a(DE-B1597)530038
035 _a(OCoLC)769927204
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aPN1995.9.S47
_bL44 2010eb
072 7 _aPER000000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a791.43 653538
_222
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aLehman, Peter
_eautore
245 1 0 _aLady Chatterley's Legacy in the Movies :
_bSex, Brains, and Body Guys /
_cSusan Hunt, Peter Lehman.
264 1 _aNew Brunswick, NJ :
_bRutgers University Press,
_c[2010]
264 4 _c©2010
300 _a1 online resource (256 p.) :
_b40 illustrations.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tIllustrations --
_tAcknowledgments --
_t1. "Everything You Are Is between Your Legs" --
_t2. Rebels, Outsiders, Artists, and . . . Brutes? --
_t3. "Fuck Me like a Cop, Not a Lawyer" --
_t4. "Brain Work Isn't Much of a Spectator Sport" --
_t5. Hung like a Horse . . . or an Acorn --
_t6. Unmaking Love --
_t7. "Why Do You Say That as if It Were a Weakness? It's Not." --
_tNotes --
_tBibliography --
_tIndex
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aTitanic. Two Moon Junction. A Night in Heaven. Sirens. Henry & June. 9 Songs. Lady Chatterley. And more. A new "body guy" genre has emerged in film during the last twenty years-a working-class man of the earth or bohemian artist awakens and fulfills the sexuality of a beautiful, intelligent woman frequently married or engaged to a sexually incompetent, educated, upper-class man. This body guy exhibits a masterful athletic, penile-centered sexual performance that enlivens and transforms the previously discontented woman's life. Peter Lehman and Susan Hunt relate a host of wide-ranging films to a literary tradition dating back to D. H. Lawrence's Lady Chatterley's Lover and an emerging body culture of our time. Through an engaging and compelling narrative, they argue that the hero's body, lovemaking style, and penis-revealed through extensive male nudity-celebrate conformity to norms of masculinity and male sexuality. Simultaneously, these films denigrate the vital, creative, erotic world of the mind. Just when women began to successfully compete with men in the workplace, these movies, if you will, unzip the penis as the one thing women do not have but want and need for their fulfillment. But Lehman and Hunt also find signs of a yearning for alternative forms of sexual and erotic pleasure in film, embracing diverse bodies and vibrant minds. Lady Chatterley's Legacy in the Movies shows how filmmakers, spectators, and all of us can be empowered to dethrone the body guy, his privileged body, and preferred style of lovemaking, replacing it with a wide range of alternatives.
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021)
650 0 _aMen in motion pictures.
650 0 _aSex in motion pictures.
650 0 _aSex role in motion pictures.
650 0 _aStereotypes (Social psychology) in motion pictures.
650 0 _aWomen in motion pictures.
650 7 _aPERFORMING ARTS / General.
_2bisacsh
700 1 _aHunt, Susan
_eautore
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.36019/9780813550299
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780813550299
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780813550299.jpg
942 _cEB
999 _c199870
_d199870