| 000 | 03244nam a22005175i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 199911 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20230501181804.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 230127t20112011nju fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9780813551388 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9780813551968 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.36019/9780813551968 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9780813551968 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)529271 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)777375530 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aPN1993.5.A1 _bB69 2012 |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aSOC000000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a791.43/09 _222 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aBozak, Nadia _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe Cinematic Footprint : _bLights, Camera, Natural Resources / _cNadia Bozak. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aNew Brunswick, NJ : _bRutgers University Press, _c[2011] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2011 | |
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (256 p.) : _b1 photograph |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tCONTENTS -- _tACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- _tIntroduction -- _tChapter 1. Energy -- _tChapter 2. Resource -- _tChapter 3. Extraction -- _tChapter 4. Excess -- _tChapter 5. Waste -- _tConclusion -- _tNotes -- _tBibliography -- _tIndex -- _tAbout the Author |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aFilm is often used to represent the natural landscape and, increasingly, to communicate environmentalist messages. Yet behind even today’s “green” movies are ecologically unsustainable production, distribution, and consumption processes. Noting how seemingly immaterial moving images are supported by highly durable resource-dependent infrastructures, The Cinematic Footprint traces the history of how the “hydrocarbon imagination” has been central to the development of film as a medium. Nadia Bozak’s innovative fusion of film studies and environmental studies makes provocative connections between the disappearance of material resources and the emergence of digital media—with examples ranging from early cinema to Dziga Vertov’s prescient eye, from Chris Marker’s analog experiments to the digital work of Agnès Varda, James Benning, and Zacharias Kunuk. Combining an analysis of cinema technology with a sensitive consideration of film aesthetics, The Cinematic Footprint offers a new perspective on moving images and the natural resources that sustain them. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 27. Jan 2023) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aMotion picture industry _xEnvironmental aspects. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aMotion pictures _xProduction and direction _xEnvironmental aspects. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aSOCIAL SCIENCE / General. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.36019/9780813551968 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780813551968 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780813551968/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c199911 _d199911 |
||